On Sat, 2019-08-03 at 16:19 +, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote:
> On Sat, 2019-08-03 at 11:12 -0400, D. Margaux wrote:
> > 2c. Enact a rule of power sufficient to give effect to its
> > terms
> > that states:
> >
> > "Any attempt to enact this rule is IMPOSSIBLE."
>
> That example is
On Sat, 2019-08-03 at 11:12 -0400, D. Margaux wrote:
> 2c. Enact a rule of power sufficient to give effect to its terms
> that states:
>
> "Any attempt to enact this rule is IMPOSSIBLE."
That example isn't impossible to enact even in the present gamestate.
You could write a proposal "Cr
On 8/3/19 10:39 AM, Nich Evans wrote:
On 8/3/19 10:12 AM, D. Margaux wrote:
On Aug 2, 2019, at 11:27 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
The caller also provides this as an example:
"Repeal Rule 1698 (Ossification).
Enact a power 100 rule that procides, 'It is IMPOSSIBLE to change
the Rules,
rules
On 8/3/19 10:12 AM, D. Margaux wrote:
On Aug 2, 2019, at 11:27 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
The caller also provides this as an example:
"Repeal Rule 1698 (Ossification).
Enact a power 100 rule that procides, 'It is IMPOSSIBLE to change the Rules,
rules to the contrary notwithstanding.'"
Again,
On 8/3/19 11:12 AM, D. Margaux wrote:
The Ossification rule says "arbitrary rule changes to be made and/or arbitrary
proposals to be adopted"--that's plural changeS/proposalS. Based on the text of the
rule, Agora is Ossified if there is a combination of rule changes and/or proposals that
are
Sorry, sent this too early. Another email coming soon.
Jason Cobb
On 8/3/19 11:16 AM, Jason Cobb wrote:
On 8/3/19 11:12 AM, D. Margaux wrote:
The Ossification rule says "arbitrary rule changes to be made and/or
arbitrary proposals to be adopted"--that's plural changeS/proposalS.
Based on th
On 8/3/19 11:12 AM, D. Margaux wrote:
The Ossification rule says "arbitrary rule changes to be made and/or arbitrary
proposals to be adopted"--that's plural changeS/proposalS. Based on the text of the
rule, Agora is Ossified if there is a combination of rule changes and/or proposals that
ar
> On Aug 2, 2019, at 11:27 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
>
> The caller also provides this as an example:
>
>> "Repeal Rule 1698 (Ossification).
>> Enact a power 100 rule that procides, 'It is IMPOSSIBLE to change the Rules,
>> rules to the contrary notwithstanding.'"
>
> Again, this is not a rule c
On 8/2/19 11:27 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
[This is only a draft.]
Sorry if this way too long (I could probably trim it down a bit if
necessary), but I did my best to cover all the ground that needs to be
covered.
Judgement in CFJ 3765:
I should probably clarify: I'm asking for feedback. Does
[This is only a draft.]
Sorry if this way too long (I could probably trim it down a bit if
necessary), but I did my best to cover all the ground that needs to be
covered.
Judgement in CFJ 3765:
I will begin by reading into the record this message from G. ([0]):
A little gratuitous for CF
10 matches
Mail list logo
