> > Might be better to make that consent conditional on the promise being
> > cashed? I can't think of a plausible situation in which it could
> > matter, but here's a contrived situation. Suppose I create a promise
> > saying I become a candidate for the election for some office. That
> > might co
Thank you for your comments!
> I wonder if this rule text could be a contract. Anyone can join, and
> anyone who's not the creator of a promise can leave.
I thought about that. It would definitely need a helper amendment (for
the acting on behalf thing, which I'm going to need to add anyway),
but
I wonder if this rule text could be a contract. Anyone can join, and
anyone who's not the creator of a promise can leave.
> Promises are a class of assets, tracked by the Notary. Their essential
> attributes are their title, text, and creator. A person CAN, by
> announcement,
> create a pro
On 5/17/20 3:04 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> A promise's bearer CAN, by announcement, cash the promise,
> provided that any conditions for cashing it specified by its text are
> unambiguously met and provided that e recites the promise's essential
> attributes in the same
This represents a reenactment of an old game system, with new text. I
mentioned that I was considering something like this a while ago. The
original is from [1], but I didn't go back and look at it until I'd
almost finished mine (that was when I decided to add the Library and
the fungibility clause
5 matches
Mail list logo
