I wonder if this rule text could be a contract. Anyone can join, and anyone who's not the creator of a promise can leave.
> Promises are a class of assets, tracked by the Notary. Their essential > attributes are their title, text, and creator. A person CAN, by > announcement, > create a promise, specifying its text and becoming its creator. A promise's > owner is referred to as its bearer. Promises with the same title, text, > creator, and bearer are fungible. I think you need to say who owns a promise when it's first created. > By creating a promise, a person consents to it being carried out. Might be better to make that consent conditional on the promise being cashed? I can't think of a plausible situation in which it could matter, but here's a contrived situation. Suppose I create a promise saying I become a candidate for the election for some office. That might count as consent to be made the holder of the office under R1006, but probably shouldn't unless the promise actually gets cashed. - Falsifian
