On 5/17/20 3:04 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote: > A promise's bearer CAN, by announcement, cash the promise, > provided that any conditions for cashing it specified by its text are > unambiguously met and provided that e recites the promise's essential > attributes in the same message. When e does so, e acts on the creator of > the promise's behalf, causing em to act as if e published the promise's > text. > By creating a promise, a person consents to it being carried out.
Is the "as if" sufficient to bypass R2466's prohibition on acting on behalf to post messages? Since this is in a rule, it can just say that the creator performs the actions (with appropriate safeguards for things the creator CAN/CANNOT do) without any acting on behalf. -- Jason Cobb
