Re: DIS: [Fwd: BUS: Muphry's Law]

2008-10-02 Thread ais523
On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 11:58 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > I've entered this into the CotC DB using the timestamp from the > "Received: from yzma.clarkk.net ... by yzma.clarkk.net ..." > header. If another timestamp would be more appropriate, then I'd > appreciate an explanation from the Distributor an

Re: DIS: [Fwd: BUS: Muphry's Law]

2008-10-02 Thread Ed Murphy
ehird wrote: > On 2 Oct 2008, at 19:58, Ed Murphy wrote: > >> I've entered this into the CotC DB using the timestamp from the >> "Received: from yzma.clarkk.net ... by yzma.clarkk.net ..." >> header. If another timestamp would be more appropriate, then I'd >> appreciate an explanation from the D

Re: DIS: [Fwd: BUS: Muphry's Law]

2008-10-02 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've entered this into the CotC DB using the timestamp from the > "Received: from yzma.clarkk.net ... by yzma.clarkk.net ..." > header. If another timestamp would be more appropriate, then I'd > appreciate an explanation from t

Re: DIS: [Fwd: BUS: Muphry's Law]

2008-10-02 Thread ehird
On 2 Oct 2008, at 19:58, Ed Murphy wrote: I've entered this into the CotC DB using the timestamp from the "Received: from yzma.clarkk.net ... by yzma.clarkk.net ..." header. If another timestamp would be more appropriate, then I'd appreciate an explanation from the Distributor and/or another ma

DIS: [Fwd: BUS: Muphry's Law]

2008-10-02 Thread Ed Murphy
I've entered this into the CotC DB using the timestamp from the "Received: from yzma.clarkk.net ... by yzma.clarkk.net ..." header. If another timestamp would be more appropriate, then I'd appreciate an explanation from the Distributor and/or another mail guru (I am not one myself). Ori