On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've entered this into the CotC DB using the timestamp from the > "Received: from yzma.clarkk.net ... by yzma.clarkk.net ..." > header. If another timestamp would be more appropriate, then I'd > appreciate an explanation from the Distributor and/or another > mail guru (I am not one myself).
The first Received: header is probably closer to the standard we've been using, but I don't think a difference of 21 seconds is all that critical, since the question is whether it was filed months ago not at a particular time today. And presumably the judge won't just rule that it's FALSE strictly because of your interpretation.
