ehird wrote: > On 2 Oct 2008, at 19:58, Ed Murphy wrote: > >> I've entered this into the CotC DB using the timestamp from the >> "Received: from yzma.clarkk.net ... by yzma.clarkk.net ..." >> header. If another timestamp would be more appropriate, then I'd >> appreciate an explanation from the Distributor and/or another >> mail guru (I am not one myself). >> > > "1 July 2008 00:00:00 +0000" would be a reasonable timestamp.
I wasn't asking you. :)
