You might even want to roll the preserved land fix into this. That's
technically not a bug, but it's a big enough malfunction that I don't
think it would be unreasonable to put it in the same proposal.
-Aris
On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 12:13 AM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> I also don't think you fixed the
I also don't think you fixed the contract upkeep cost bug.
-Aris
On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 12:05 AM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 3:10 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>> I create the following proposal; keeping it in the Pool in case of final
>> feedback.
>>
>> Title: PAoaM Patch
>> AI:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 3:10 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> I create the following proposal; keeping it in the Pool in case of final
> feedback.
>
> Title: PAoaM Patch
> AI: 3
> Authors: Gaelan, Trigon
>
> —
> In Rule 105 “Rule Changes,” replace "If the reenacting proposal provides new
> text for the
3 matches
Mail list logo
