On Sun, 15 Apr 2018, ATMunn wrote:
I wasn't entirely sure what to do for the Transparent. The goal was to make
it the same color as a blank spot (and making the blank spots slightly gray
to differentiate from white). I'm not exactly sure why it wouldn't work
though, can you send a screenshot?
Thanks. I think the main reason why I didn't use the built-in color
definitions is that I came up with all the colors for the ribbons before
I did any of the actual CSS, and so I just copied and pasted the color
codes. After that, I just wanted to keep things consistent.
Also, I've just about
I just submitted a PR to your GitHub repo that should fix the problem. By
the way, any particular reason you're not just using built in color
definitions where possible (e.g. white, black)?
-Aris
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 6:04 PM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It won
It won't work for a user who has changed the background color of the
page, and CSS is supposed to be customizable by the end user. What you
need to do is change your .t class from "background-color: #f7f7f7;"
to "background-color: transparent;", which will make it actually
transparent, not just the
Oh, it did go through, I just wasn't looking in the right place. Sorry.
On 4/15/2018 5:05 PM, Corona wrote:
I did think that it was weird that nobody was responding to me, but I
checked and it's in the archives.
~Corona
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 10:28 PM, ATMunn wrote:
No, it doesn't appea
I wasn't entirely sure what to do for the Transparent. The goal was to
make it the same color as a blank spot (and making the blank spots
slightly gray to differentiate from white). I'm not exactly sure why it
wouldn't work though, can you send a screenshot?
On 4/15/2018 7:56 PM, Ørjan Johanse
I'm pretty sure I saw it, although I didn't keep a copy.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Sun, 15 Apr 2018, Corona wrote:
I did think that it was weird that nobody was responding to me, but I
checked and it's in the archives.
~Corona
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 10:28 PM, ATMunn wrote:
No, it doesn't a
On Sun, 15 Apr 2018, ATMunn wrote:
3) I'm working on creating an HTML version of the report, which will also be
generated by the aforementioned Python script. Once it's ready, there will be
an always up-to-date report on the AgoraNomic GitHub. For the moment, I also
have an example of what it
I did think that it was weird that nobody was responding to me, but I
checked and it's in the archives.
~Corona
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 10:28 PM, ATMunn wrote:
> No, it doesn't appear to have gone through.
>
>
> On 4/15/2018 4:15 PM, Corona wrote:
>
>> Didn't anybody notice my email from Wed
No, it doesn't appear to have gone through.
On 4/15/2018 4:15 PM, Corona wrote:
Didn't anybody notice my email from Wednesday, replying to ATMunn:
"I was under the impression I had already collected stuff from (-1,-1) via
Quazie. Anyways, you couldn't collect assets from two facilities, because
This is what I get for not properly reading the rules.
On 4/15/2018 2:59 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
I just realized this, but I'm pretty sure this transfer is invalid anyways
as you can only take from one preserved facility per week.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018, 07:33 ATMunn wrote:
Actually I believe
Fair. I'm sure there's an easy way to say it... yet this is Agora we're
talking about, so probably not.
On 4/15/2018 3:50 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
That sentence is long and hard to understand though.
-Aris
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 6:30 AM ATMunn wrote:
Looks good, but I feel you could conde
Didn't anybody notice my email from Wednesday, replying to ATMunn:
"I was under the impression I had already collected stuff from (-1,-1) via
Quazie. Anyways, you couldn't collect assets from two facilities, because
Ensure Fair Distribution of Assets passed."
???
~Corona
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 a
That sentence is long and hard to understand though.
-Aris
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 6:30 AM ATMunn wrote:
> Looks good, but I feel you could condense those two sentences into one
> with something like this:
>
> If there exists one or more Units of non-Aether Land in the possession
> of Agora wit
I just realized this, but I'm pretty sure this transfer is invalid anyways
as you can only take from one preserved facility per week.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018, 07:33 ATMunn wrote:
> Actually I believe this failed, as I tried to move from black to white
> by spending only one apple.
>
> If I am still
Hmm, I don't really have anything to contest this... I think I'll try to
automate Herald somehow, too.
~Corona
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 6:10 PM, ATMunn wrote:
> So, we have an upcoming Tailor election, in which I am a candidate. Here
> are some reasons to vote for me when the time comes:
>
> 1)
I have to say, that HTML report looks really nice! I, obviously, am very
in support of office automation and interactive reports.
On 04/15/2018 10:10 AM, ATMunn wrote:
So, we have an upcoming Tailor election, in which I am a candidate. Here
are some reasons to vote for me when the time comes:
So, we have an upcoming Tailor election, in which I am a candidate. Here
are some reasons to vote for me when the time comes:
1) I don't have any other office, so if I win, I won't increase
consolidation (that's probably not a great reason, but I have better ones)
2) I plan to create a Python
Looks good, but I feel you could condense those two sentences into one
with something like this:
If there exists one or more Units of non-Aether Land in the possession
of Agora with the preservation switch set to False, either all of them
if there are less than 5 or 5 of them if there are 5 or
19 matches
Mail list logo
