On Sat, 14 Apr 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
Submitting this to a-d since I don't trust myself to submit the actual thing
yet. Please fix my inevitable mistakes.
For each land unit selectd by the process described above, the
Cartographor CAN and SHALL initiate an auction with it as t
Submitting this to a-d since I don't trust myself to submit the actual
thing yet. Please fix my inevitable mistakes.
Title: 5 auctions
AI: 1
Author: Trigon
Co-author(s):
Amend rule 2004 "Land Auctions" by replacing the entire text with:
Every Agoran Week, if the number of units of Privat
On Sat, 14 Apr 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
The proposal reads "since" the 1st, so any text with both the right label and
correct hash published between April 1 and when the proposal takes effect
(If it passes) should trigger it. Texts with label but not correct hash (or
vice
versa) shouldn't affe
I reposted it to business
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 11:13 PM, Kenyon Prater wrote:
> This was Nttpf I think.
>
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2018, 12:55 AM Ned Strange wrote:
>
>> I vote as follows:
>> 8033: PRESENT
>> 8034: FOR
>> 8035: FOR
>> 8036: FOR
>> 8037: FOR
>> 8038: AGAINST, foiled by power
>> 8039:
Every registrar report has been auto-sent to spam for as long as I
remember, whitelisting notwithstanding. I guess it's because all the
emails appear as links.
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 3:42 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> You could actually look at the report to get your answer if you liked. :P
>
> O
Darn it. I misread that. Nevermind what I said about not worrying about it.
-Aris
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018, 1:35 PM Kenyon Prater wrote:
> It's "since April 1, 2018" not "as of", no? There are other reasons why I
> don't think this works though.
>
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 1:30 PM, Aris Merchant <
The proposal reads "since" the 1st, so any text with both the right label and
correct hash published between April 1 and when the proposal takes effect
(If it passes) should trigger it. Texts with label but not correct hash (or
vice
versa) shouldn't affect that.
On Sat, 14 Apr 2018, Aris Merch
It's "since April 1, 2018" not "as of", no? There are other reasons why I
don't think this works though.
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 1:30 PM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Not published as of the 1st. Don't worry about the proposal too much.
>
> -Aris
>
> On Sat, Apr 14
Not published as of the 1st. Don't worry about the proposal too much.
-Aris
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018, 1:18 PM Kenyon Prater wrote:
> I publish the following body of text, labeled TALES OF THE ZOMBIE
> APOCALYPSE: {
> Nothing happens.
> }
>
You could actually look at the report to get your answer if you liked. :P
On Sat, 14 Apr 2018, Ned Strange wrote:
> The registrar does have to track these btw. I don't know if e is doing
> so, but any Registrar report with no emotions is not a report.
>
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 10:42 AM, Kenyo
Seconded.
On Saturday, April 14, 2018, ATMunn wrote:
> For the record, though, I think I do actually prefer the 5 auctions thing.
> It seems like it's a lot more interesting.
>
> On 4/13/2018 2:39 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I don't consider 1 auctions/5 auctions to be a patch. It works a
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 7:31 AM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 12:55 AM Ned Strange
> wrote:
>
> > I vote as follows:
> > 8033: PRESENT
> > 8034: FOR
> > 8035: FOR
> > 8036: FOR
> > 8037: FOR
> > 8038: AGAINST, foiled by power
> > 8039: Regret
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 12:55 AM Ned Strange
wrote:
> I vote as follows:
> 8033: PRESENT
> 8034: FOR
> 8035: FOR
> 8036: FOR
> 8037: FOR
> 8038: AGAINST, foiled by power
> 8039: Regrettably, FOR
> 8040: AGAINST. I think 5 blots+3 a month will be more than enough for
> everybody to be blot-free, w
I made the rule but I think I'd have to say yes. It was the first
proposal I made, after all...
On 4/13/2018 8:26 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
Should we repeal the emotions rule? No one seems to be using it.
-Aris
For the record, though, I think I do actually prefer the 5 auctions
thing. It seems like it's a lot more interesting.
On 4/13/2018 2:39 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I don't consider 1 auctions/5 auctions to be a patch. It works as is,
but some people want it a different way (never mind that includ
This was Nttpf I think.
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018, 12:55 AM Ned Strange wrote:
> I vote as follows:
> 8033: PRESENT
> 8034: FOR
> 8035: FOR
> 8036: FOR
> 8037: FOR
> 8038: AGAINST, foiled by power
> 8039: Regrettably, FOR
> 8040: AGAINST. I think 5 blots+3 a month will be more than enough for
> every
I vote as follows:
8033: PRESENT
8034: FOR
8035: FOR
8036: FOR
8037: FOR
8038: AGAINST, foiled by power
8039: Regrettably, FOR
8040: AGAINST. I think 5 blots+3 a month will be more than enough for
everybody to be blot-free, which means that there is no incentive to
buy temples (paper is the only re
The registrar does have to track these btw. I don't know if e is doing
so, but any Registrar report with no emotions is not a report.
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 10:42 AM, Kenyon Prater wrote:
> I flip my emotions switch to Meloncholy at the thought of losing the
> Emotions rule
>
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2
Yes.
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 10:26 AM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> Should we repeal the emotions rule? No one seems to be using it.
>
> -Aris
--
>From V.J. Rada
19 matches
Mail list logo
