On Sat, 14 Apr 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
The proposal reads "since" the 1st, so any text with both the right label and
correct hash published between April 1 and when the proposal takes effect
(If it passes) should trigger it. Texts with label but not correct hash (or
vice
versa) shouldn't affect that.
Hm I thought of the same thing as Kenyon Prater but didn't do anything
with it. I believe there is enough ambiguity in your proposal that eir
defense *might* just be judged to work, although it depends on very picky
interpretation of the grammar.
Basically the defense works if the part before the AND is interpreted as
picking out a *unique* body of text, while the part from the AND on is
interpreted as a condition on the body of text already picked.
However it would be trivial to resubmit the proposal with a fix (assuming
there's nothing else about the scam you cannot delay).
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Sat, 14 Apr 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
Not published as of the 1st. Don't worry about the proposal too much.
-Aris
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018, 1:18 PM Kenyon Prater <kprater3...@gmail.com> wrote:
I publish the following body of text, labeled TALES OF THE ZOMBIE
APOCALYPSE: {
Nothing happens.
}
