Title: Referee Reform and Card Appealability
Author: V.J. Rada,
(I stole a lot of ideas here so if you recognize your own, tell me)
AI: 2
Text:
Change the power of rule 2451, Executive Orders, to 2.0. In this rule,
replace the text "The reason for the card MAY be any grievance held by
the Prime Min
Well... no one said the reason had to be accurate :V
On 2017-10-29 14:10, VJ Rada wrote:
Bayushi is actually a 0-karma inactive.
Bayushi is actually a 0-karma inactive.
>>> +1 Japan
COE: Japan is no player or entity! (although I know who you mean, of course)
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> The Honour Roll
> [Herald's Weekly Report]
>
>
> KarmaEntity
>
"nor is it appropriate if the undecidability arises from the case itself."
On Sun, 29 Oct 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
> I suppose that's IRRELEVANT.
>
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 1:09 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> Doesn't this allow for making statements that include well-known
> logical paradoxes that
Doesn't this allow for making statements that include well-known logical
paradoxes that have no bearing on the game itself? (Eg: A barber who must
shave all who do not shave themselves and nobody else, cannot shave emself)
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> Proposal: A Most I
I suppose that's IRRELEVANT.
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 1:09 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> Doesn't this allow for making statements that include well-known logical
> paradoxes that have no bearing on the game itself? (Eg: A barber who must
> shave all who do not shave themselves and nobody else, cannot shav
Hey, it's AP that resets within 24 hours.
On 2017-10-29 12:26, ATMunn wrote:
yeah it probably wasn't worth spending an AP.
oh well ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
On 10/28/2017 8:34 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
I change my vote to just Trigon (if I did not vote, I vote for Trigon)
TTttPF is not a rule-defined thing. Adding
yeah it probably wasn't worth spending an AP.
oh well ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
On 10/28/2017 8:34 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
I change my vote to just Trigon (if I did not vote, I vote for Trigon)
TTttPF is not a rule-defined thing. Adding a few extra ts changes nothing in
the actual understanding.
On Sun, Oct 29, 2
What do people think about giving some of the Pot to the Promotor? If so,
what is a reasonable amount?
天火狐
On 28 October 2017 at 19:02, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-10-28 at 15:44 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > I didn't consider that. They do have to bury it so people don't know
> > which
On Sat, 2017-10-28 at 15:44 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> I didn't consider that. They do have to bury it so people don't know
> which proposal it is, don't they. Sigh.
I'd argue that the best fix here is simply to increase the pend fee.
Doubling it (to 2 AP or twice the current number of shinies)
Sorry Aris! It's also worth considering that people don't have to do it in
one week, so that might be a silver lining.
天火狐
On 28 October 2017 at 18:44, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I didn't consider that. They do have to bury it so people don't know
> which propos
I didn't consider that. They do have to bury it so people don't know
which proposal it is, don't they. Sigh.
-Aris
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 3:42 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> Yeah, I'm predicting several proposals from every party, absolutely. So
> it'll be a tough week for Aris in that capacity.
>
> On S
Yeah, I'm predicting several proposals from every party, absolutely. So
it'll be a tough week for Aris in that capacity.
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Alex Smith
wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-10-28 at 15:37 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > I'm not Notary, just Promotor and Regkeepor. I think you mean
Oh. That makes sense. It's still probably going to be a bigger problem
for o than me though.
-Aris
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-10-28 at 15:37 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
>> I'm not Notary, just Promotor and Regkeepor. I think you mean o. I
>> pay o 5 shinies
On Sat, 2017-10-28 at 15:37 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> I'm not Notary, just Promotor and Regkeepor. I think you mean o. I
> pay o 5 shinies to thank em for taking the job.
The contract in question is hardly changing, but it strongly encourages
players to write proposals. So the prediction is th
For keeping track of contracts? Surely a little bit of bookkeeping is worth
interesting gameplay. As far as I understand it, the Notary only has to
keep track of who is party to the Occult Hand, the Treasurer needs to keep
track of the Pot, and I have to do everything else.
天火狐
On 28 October 2017
This might be another tough week for Aris :(
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I join the occult hand contract and wish to wager.
>
> On Sat, 28 Oct 2017, Josh T wrote:
> > I am pleased to announce that V.J. Rada has received eir Shibboleth.
> > 天火狐
>
>
--
>From V.J. R
I vote {Trigon, Alexis}
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 4:49 AM, Reuben Staley
wrote:
> I vote [Trigon, Alexis]
>
> On 10/28/2017 8:42 AM, ATMunn wrote:
>
>> As per my duties as ADoP, I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to select
>> the winner of the Rulekeepor election.
>>
>> For this decision, the v
I think you meant 7947?
On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 at 13:42 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I change my votes on proposals 7946 and 7047 to AGAINST.
>
>
> On 10/28/2017 10:06 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > I vote:
> > On Fri, 27 Oct 2017, Aris Merchant wro
On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 at 02:28 Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [Hopefully I've got everything right. The Proposal Pool will take a
> few more days, and may even be a bit late. My apologies for any
> inconvenience.]
>
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiatin
Ah, okay. I almost always use reply-list, unless the button is not available.
On 10/27/2017 10:14 PM, Madeline wrote:
Look at whether there's a "Reply To" in the email header. If there is, clicking
standard reply will send to that address (the mailing list usually puts a-d as a reply to
on bus
22 matches
Mail list logo
