On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 at 02:28 Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [Hopefully I've got everything right. The Proposal Pool will take a > few more days, and may even be a bit late. My apologies for any > inconvenience.] > > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal > pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the > quorum is 5.0 and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is > also a valid vote). > > ID Author(s) AI Title Pender Pend > fee > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > 7931* G. 3.0 Registration fix finally G. 1 sh. > FOR > 7932* ATMunn, [1] 1.0 A Reward for Obedience v5 ATMunn 1 AP > FOR > 7933* Alexis 3.0 Ribbon Preservation Act Alexis 1 sh. > FOR > 7934* 天火狐 1.0 Poetry Duel Challenge Writ 天火狐 OP [2] > FOR > 7935* Trigon 3.0 Revision Limits v2 Trigon 1 AP ENDORSE the Treasuror > 7936* V.J. Rada 2.0 Print Money V.J. Rada 1 AP > FOR > 7937* V.J. Rada, o 2.0 I Demand Faster Auctions V.J. Rada 1 AP > AGAINST > 7938* Aris 3.0 Fix Campaign Proposals Aris 1 AP > FOR > 7939* V.J. Rada 1.0 Repeal the Reportor V.J. Rada 1 sh. > AGAINST > 7940* Alexis, [3] 3.0 High Power Cleanup Alexis 1 sh. > FOR > 7941* Alexis 1.0 HTML Scrubbing Alexis 1 sh. > FOR > 7942* Alexis 1.0 No List Prefixes Alexis 1 sh. > CONDITIONAL: FOR unless the total strength FOR would be exactly 1 greater than the total strength AGAINST, after evaluating all other conditional votes, in which case PRESENT. > 7943* ATMunn 2.0 Mini fixes ATMunn 1 sh. > FOR > 7944* Trigon 2.0 Who's the Secretary? Trigon 1 AP > FOR. This does work because it amends only one rule; amendments of different rules must be ordered, but amendments inside a single rule need not be. > 7945* Telnaior 1.0 Name and Shame Telnaior 1 AP > FOR > 7946* Telnaior 3.0 MASUAC [4] Telnaior 1 AP > FOR > 7947* V.J. Rada, [5] 3.0 MCVotA [6] V.J. Rada 2 sh. > FOR I am not okay with making a player a Zombie who has not had a chance to see the rule; consequently, I will vote against the Zombie proposal unless these players are all deregistered or the Zombie proposal has a way to protect them.
