DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 3107 assigned to ais523

2011-10-20 Thread Sean Hunt
> Judge: ais523 > :ARROW:

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: HELP! (Call to Arms)

2011-10-20 Thread Pavitra
On 10/20/2011 10:14 PM, Elliott Hird wrote: > On 21 October 2011 04:08, Elliott Hird > wrote: >> Arguments: > > More arguments: > > Judge ais523's example hypothetical violation of that clause in eir > judgement of CFJ 2515 was "to bring Agora into sufficient disrepute > that playing nomic was

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: HELP! (Call to Arms)

2011-10-20 Thread Elliott Hird
On 21 October 2011 04:08, Elliott Hird wrote: > Arguments: More arguments: Judge ais523's example hypothetical violation of that clause in eir judgement of CFJ 2515 was "to bring Agora into sufficient disrepute that playing nomic was made illegal in a real-world country"; the alleged violation h

DIS: Re: BUS: HELP! (Call to Arms)

2011-10-20 Thread Pavitra
On 10/20/2011 10:05 PM, John Smith wrote: > I initiate a criminal case. Gratuitous arguments: The crux of the caller's argument is this: > CfJ 2515 found that bringing Agora into disrepute would violate rule > 101. The Accused has most certainly done so. Opinions on a scam still in progress may

DIS: Re: BUS: HELP! (Call to Arms)

2011-10-20 Thread Elliott Hird
On 21 October 2011 04:05, John Smith wrote: > The Accused is omd (known elsewhere as comex) > I allege that the Accused has stirred up prejudice and ill-will against > Agora among the Artists of Blognomic by sending the message quoted in > Evidence to a public forum and several members of Blognomi

DIS: Re: BUS: HELP! (Call to Arms)

2011-10-20 Thread Pavitra
On 10/20/2011 08:44 PM, omd wrote: > VOTE FOR OUR CFJ > (http://blognomic.com/archive/cfj_attn_cotc/) by posting a comment > containing ":FOR:"! Please also vote :AGAINST: the defense CFJs: http://blognomic.com/archive/emergency_law/ http://blognomic.com/archive/emergency_law_patch/

DIS: On the Mister Snuggles cases

2011-10-20 Thread Ed Murphy
Gratuitous on 3105-06: Rule 478, relevant excerpt: Where the rules define an action that CAN be performed "by announcement", a person performs that action by unambiguously and clearly specifying the action and announcing that e performs it. Especially in light of these ca

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Nomination

2011-10-20 Thread Ed Murphy
Arkady English wrote: > Ah, right, IADoP initiated the election, though I don't think I ever > actually went inactive between nomination and election. (The census > doesn't seem to think so...) Sat 6 Aug 10:36:50 Walker declines Promotor and Rulekeepor; nominates ais523,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Invasion protection

2011-10-20 Thread comexk
Invadors? Sent from my iPhone On Oct 20, 2011, at 12:42 PM, ais523 wrote: > On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 12:14 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> >> On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, ais523 wrote: >>> On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 09:28 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: On 20 October 2011 11:48, Alex Smith wrote: > An Elder

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Nomination

2011-10-20 Thread Ed Murphy
Arkady English wrote: > I accept my nomination. NttPF > (Do we have to do that? I can't remember, and > don't want to go looking through the rules at work.) Yes, unless you nominated yourself. Rule 2154 (Election Procedure), relevant excerpt: 1) The valid options are the active players

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Invasion protection

2011-10-20 Thread ais523
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 12:14 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, ais523 wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 09:28 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On 20 October 2011 11:48, Alex Smith wrote: > > > > An Elder > > > > > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, Arkady English wrote: > > > > Eldars > > > >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Speed

2011-10-20 Thread Pavitra
On 10/20/2011 02:18 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, ais523 wrote: >> On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 13:32 -0500, Pavitra wrote: >>> On 10/20/2011 01:30 PM, ais523 wrote: I continue supporting on the basis that regardless of whether Agora will need to act quickly, that doesn't m

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Speed

2011-10-20 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, ais523 wrote: > On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 13:32 -0500, Pavitra wrote: > > On 10/20/2011 01:30 PM, ais523 wrote: > > > I continue supporting on the basis that regardless of whether Agora will > > > need to act quickly, that doesn't mean that it actually /will/ be able > > > to act

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Invasion protection

2011-10-20 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, ais523 wrote: > On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 09:28 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On 20 October 2011 11:48, Alex Smith wrote: > > > An Elder > > > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, Arkady English wrote: > > > Eldars > > > > Please. Eldors. > > "Someone who elds"? I thought the Agoran -or f

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Speed

2011-10-20 Thread ais523
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 13:32 -0500, Pavitra wrote: > On 10/20/2011 01:30 PM, ais523 wrote: > > I continue supporting on the basis that regardless of whether Agora will > > need to act quickly, that doesn't mean that it actually /will/ be able > > to act quickly. If something (repelling invaders, for

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Speed

2011-10-20 Thread Pavitra
On 10/20/2011 01:30 PM, ais523 wrote: > On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 19:23 +0100, Charles Walker wrote: >> On 20 October 2011 18:58, Sean Hunt wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 00:07, woggle wrote: I intend, with Agoran Consent, to set the Speed to Slow. I intend, without objection,

DIS: Re: BUS: Speed

2011-10-20 Thread ais523
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 19:23 +0100, Charles Walker wrote: > On 20 October 2011 18:58, Sean Hunt wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 00:07, woggle wrote: > >> > >> I intend, with Agoran Consent, to set the Speed to Slow. > >> > >> I intend, without objection, to set the Speed to Slow. > >> > >> [I w

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: BAK: mr snuggles' manifesto

2011-10-20 Thread Pavitra
On 10/20/2011 12:14 PM, Elliott Hird wrote: > On 20 October 2011 18:03, Pavitra wrote: >> I doubt each such claim of identity. > > There are no claims of identity there, only a claim of no claims of > non-identity. That interpretation occurred to me, but I'd rather head it off now than wait for

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: BAK: mr snuggles' manifesto

2011-10-20 Thread Elliott Hird
On 20 October 2011 18:03, Pavitra wrote: > I doubt each such claim of identity. There are no claims of identity there, only a claim of no claims of non-identity.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Invasion protection

2011-10-20 Thread Elliott Hird
On 20 October 2011 17:40, ais523 wrote: > "Someone who elds"? I will vote FOR this proposal iff it involves Eldors elding for some critical purpose, and AGAINST otherwise.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Invasion protection

2011-10-20 Thread ais523
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 09:28 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On 20 October 2011 11:48, Alex Smith wrote: > > An Elder > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, Arkady English wrote: > > Eldars > > Please. Eldors. "Someone who elds"? I thought the Agoran -or form was only used in cases where the word was actually

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Invasion protection

2011-10-20 Thread Kerim Aydin
On 20 October 2011 11:48, Alex Smith wrote: > An Elder On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, Arkady English wrote: > Eldars Please. Eldors.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Nomination

2011-10-20 Thread Arkady English
On 20 October 2011 13:20, Arkady English wrote: > On 20 October 2011 13:09, Arkady English > wrote: >> On 20 October 2011 12:49, Geoffrey Spear wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: I nominate Arkady English for Promotor. >>> >>> I nominate myself as Promotor. >>> -

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Nomination

2011-10-20 Thread Arkady English
On 20 October 2011 13:09, Arkady English wrote: > On 20 October 2011 12:49, Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: >>> I nominate Arkady English for Promotor. >> >> I nominate myself as Promotor. >> -- >> Wooble >> > > I accept my nomination. (Do we have to do

DIS: Re: BUS: Nomination

2011-10-20 Thread Arkady English
On 20 October 2011 12:49, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: >> I nominate Arkady English for Promotor. > > I nominate myself as Promotor. > -- > Wooble > I accept my nomination. (Do we have to do that? I can't remember, and don't want to go looking through

DIS: Re: BUS: Invasion protection

2011-10-20 Thread Arkady English
On 20 October 2011 11:48, Alex Smith wrote: > > I've noticed we're missing an invasion protection rule at the moment. > Given that due to events elsewhere, it seems that an invasion may well > be imminent, I submit the following proposal (Title="Invasion > protection", AI=2, Ordinary): > > Cr