Invadors? Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 20, 2011, at 12:42 PM, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 12:14 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> >> On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, ais523 wrote: >>> On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 09:28 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: >>>> On 20 October 2011 11:48, Alex Smith <ais...@bham.ac.uk> wrote: >>>>> An Elder >>>> >>>> On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, Arkady English wrote: >>>>> Eldars >>>> >>>> Please. Eldors. >>> >>> "Someone who elds"? I thought the Agoran -or form was only used in cases >>> where the word was actually derived from a verb. >>> >>> I'm open to terminology/flavour changes, at least. Also, mechanics >>> changes, if those are necessary. >> >> I liked the Elder terminology in general, but following these comments >> I agree there should be a way to eld. > > Let's see… elding someone should probably be what we do to invaders, as > it's the only think the Eldors would have much of a reason to do. > > So I suppose it should make all their offices Assumed, force them > supine, and /possibly/ remove their vote (although that is risky to put > in a quickly-written rule, and would require power 3 rather than 2 if it > were to affect democratic proposals as well as ordinary proposals; > invaders are more likely to try to force a proposal through as > democratic, as typical ordinary voting systems would favour existing > players). > > -- > ais523 >
