DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2977 assigned to G.

2011-03-22 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Jonathan Rouillard wrote: > Uuhhh... > > Gratuitous arguments: > A. Any /person/ identified by the author as a co-author is a co-author. > B.  MRW&A was identified by the author as a co-author. > C. Therefore, MRW&A is a person. > > IMO, that doesn't hold 'cause you're su

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2977 assigned to G.

2011-03-22 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Ed Murphy wrote: > G. wrote: > > > On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Ed Murphy wrote: > >>> == CFJ 2977 == > >>> MRW and Associates is a second-class person. > > > > The argument f

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2977 assigned to G.

2011-03-22 Thread Ed Murphy
G. wrote: > On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Ed Murphy wrote: >>> == CFJ 2977 == >>> MRW and Associates is a second-class person. > > The argument for True seems to stem from R107 arguing as follows: > A.

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2977 assigned to G.

2011-03-22 Thread Elliott Hird
On 23 March 2011 00:57, Jonathan Rouillard wrote: > Uuhhh... > > Gratuitous arguments: > A.  Any /person/ identified by the author as a co-author is a co-author. > B.  MRW&A was identified by the author as a co-author. > C.  Therefore, MRW&A is a person. > > IMO, that doesn't hold 'cause you're su