On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Jonathan Rouillard wrote: > Uuhhh... > > Gratuitous arguments: > A. Any /person/ identified by the author as a co-author is a co-author. > B. MRW&A was identified by the author as a co-author. > C. Therefore, MRW&A is a person. > > IMO, that doesn't hold 'cause you're supposing that MRW&A is a person > to make A relevant, then say that since A is relevant MRW&A is a > person. That's circular logic right there.
Er, yeah, that's exactly why I said that A-C was a fallacy and said it was false.
