On 23 March 2011 00:57, Jonathan Rouillard <jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com> wrote: > Uuhhh... > > Gratuitous arguments: > A. Any /person/ identified by the author as a co-author is a co-author. > B. MRW&A was identified by the author as a co-author. > C. Therefore, MRW&A is a person. > > IMO, that doesn't hold 'cause you're supposing that MRW&A is a person > to make A relevant, then say that since A is relevant MRW&A is a > person. That's circular logic right there. Heck, if this were true, I > could author anything, say that my table is co-author thus making it a > person and then making it join Agora. Surely, there's another way to > prove that MRW&A is a person, but I don't think these argument should > be precedent to anything. =P
It's too bad G. didn't concur with you and judge FALSE based on those arguments. ;)
