scshunt wrote:
> On 10-11-21 10:50 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> History:
>>
>> Called by scshunt: 09 Nov 2010 01:24:37 GMT
>> Assigned to ais523: 15 Nov 2010 00:17:03 GMT
>> Judged TRUE by ais523: 20 Nov 2010 22:25:03 GMT
>> Assigned to ais523:
I wrote:
> [Disclaimer: this assumes that Wooble's recent purported
> deregistration was ineffective.]
Actually, the time limit on panel opinions ran out before the
purported deregistration.
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> When it is convenient for H. CotC Murphy, could e please update eir DB to
> allow for proper description of motions to reconsider?
I don't know, why don't you ask him?
On 10-11-21 10:50 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
History:
Called by scshunt: 09 Nov 2010 01:24:37 GMT
Assigned to ais523: 15 Nov 2010 00:17:03 GMT
Judged TRUE by ais523: 20 Nov 2010 22:25:03 GMT
Assigned to ais523: 22 Nov 2010 0
G. wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Yally wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 20:15, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Judgement: FALSE. As per Wooble's gratuitous arguments, with the
added note that when a player becomes Active, the Registrar is not
(ceases to be) required to t
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Yally wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 20:15, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >> Judgement: FALSE. As per Wooble's gratuitous arguments, with the
> >> added note that when a player becomes Active, the Registrar is not
> >> (ceases to be) required to track the pre
Yally wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 20:15, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 20 Nov 2010, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2900
>>>
>>> === CFJ 2900 (Interest Index = 0)
>>>
>>> The Registrar's most rece
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 20:15, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 20 Nov 2010, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2900
>>
>> === CFJ 2900 (Interest Index = 0)
>>
>> The Registrar's most recent report should have in
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 19:20, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I resign from all offices I hold, if not.
I feel like everything you've done here has failed. The subject line
deregistration is widely agreed to have failed, and the addition of
the clause "if not" seems to undo your resignations due to
ambi
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 5:25 PM, ais523 wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 16:17 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2897
>>
>> === CFJ 2897 (Interest Index = 0)
>>
>> ehird was a Rebel in the most recent Rebel
On 10-11-21 07:04 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I submit the following proposal, "Payday", AI=1, II-0:
{
Enact the following Rule, entitled "Taxes":
At noon GMT on Monday of each Nomic Week, the Banker shall levy
a Tax on all Marks accounts except the Bank. The Tax for
Players shal
omd wrote:
>> *6882 O0 1.0 G. Other documents
>> *6883 O1 1.0 omd Read Requirement
>
> I swear I read a message asking the Assessor to resolve these in reverse
> order (to allow them both to take effect), but I can't find it. If such a
> message was sent, I'd like to tra
On 10-11-21 03:34 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
-
23 ais523 (Captain)
18 coppro
12 ehird
16 Flameshadowxeroshin
13 G.
16 Keba
04 omd (Marine)
13 Sgeo
13 Tanner L. Swett
16 Yally
Minor request: That this list be sorted by number, not name.
-scshunt
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 15:44 -0500, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 10-11-21 03:40 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> > Yes. I withdraw the above proposal. Also, CoE on the most recent ATC's
> > report. Murphy should have one more prop and coppro one fewer, as I
> > attempted to add a prop transfer (on 07 Nov) that
On 10-11-21 03:40 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Yes. I withdraw the above proposal. Also, CoE on the most recent ATC's
report. Murphy should have one more prop and coppro one fewer, as I
attempted to add a prop transfer (on 07 Nov) that I had missed
previously, though it already self-ratified to not
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 15:33 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> Proposal: Self-ratify props(AI=1, II=1)
>
> Add the following paragraph such that it is the fourth paragraph of
> Rule 2287:
>
> The portion of the Air Traffic Controller's report listing the number
> of props that each player posesses is
On 21 November 2010 18:50, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Can you please provide your reasoning? Regardless of how the CFJ is judged,
> it is the platonic truth that matters.
Platonist scum!
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 22:25, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 20 November 2010 23:33, ais523 wrote:
> > 6882 passed? WTF?
> >
> > If I were Wooble, I'd deregister in protest.
>
> As B became Agora, now shall Agora become B.
>
> I, for one, welcome our new clinically insane overlords.
>
Well, some of
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 13:50 -0500, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 10-11-20 06:20 PM, ais523 wrote:
> > I'm sorry, there had to be a time difference between the messages or it
> > wouldn't have worked. (I do think the correct judgement is TRUE, though,
> > although there isn't strong evidence either way.)
>
On 10-11-20 06:20 PM, ais523 wrote:
I'm sorry, there had to be a time difference between the messages or it
wouldn't have worked. (I do think the correct judgement is TRUE, though,
although there isn't strong evidence either way.)
Can you please provide your reasoning? Regardless of how the CFJ
20 matches
Mail list logo
