On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 20:15, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > On Sat, 20 Nov 2010, Ed Murphy wrote: >> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2900 >> >> =================== CFJ 2900 (Interest Index = 0) ==================== >> >> The Registrar's most recent report should have included that >> Tiger became Inactive on 2 May, 2010, as the Registrar is >> required to include in eir report "when each Inactive player >> became Inactive." >> >> ======================================================================== > > I set this case's II to 1. > > Judgement: FALSE. As per Wooble's gratuitous arguments, with the > added note that when a player becomes Active, the Registrar is not > (ceases to be) required to track the previous inactivity dates; so > following the caller's reading would require information untracked > for months/years to suddenly become tracked; that's an unreasonable > reading. > > I award myself a capacitor. > > -G.
Interesting. However, the Registrar is required to include the dates of registration/deregistration of all former players. However, if a player deregisters and later registers, the Registrar is no longer required to track eir old dates of registration/deregistration, but would later be so required if the player deregisters again.
