omd wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Sean Hunt
> wrote:
=== CFJ 2890 (Interest Index = 0)
It is generally POSSIBLE for me to make a proposal
Undistributable for a fee.
===
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Side note: When I proposed this, I thought for a while about sneaking
> an "only" between "CAN" and "perform" for the final draft and hoping
> no-one noticed it would shut off all other ways of doing things
> associated with a fee. Didn't, th
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, omd wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > As "forbidden" is not defined as directly associated with a particular
> > MMI mode, and (in general English) could be applied to either CAN or SHALL,
> > I'd say context is important. In this case, the "o
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:12:33 -0400, omd wrote:
> Proposal: Refactor contracts (AI=2, II=1, Distributable via fee)
> Coauthors: Murphy, ais523
>
> Amend Rule 1742 (Contracts) by replacing this text:
>
> Parties to a contract SHALL act in accordance with that
> contract. This obligat
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:42 PM, omd wrote:
> > I intend to appeal this with two support. Making a proposal
> > undistributable modifies information for which some player is required
> > to be a recordkeepor, so R2125 forbids me from doing it except
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:42 PM, omd wrote:
> I intend to appeal this with two support. Making a proposal
> undistributable modifies information for which some player is required
> to be a recordkeepor, so R2125 forbids me from doing it except as
> allowed by the rules.
>
> Evidence:
>
> e)
On 10-10-18 01:14 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
The voting periods on Proposals 6858 - 6862 have been extended. Quorum
is 5; the following players have voted:
coppro (ineffective, too many Rests)
I believe I vetoed every decision before voting, making Rests not matter?
-coppro
7 matches
Mail list logo
