On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:12:33 -0400, omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote: > Proposal: Refactor contracts (AI=2, II=1, Distributable via fee) > Coauthors: Murphy, ais523 > > Amend Rule 1742 (Contracts) by replacing this text: > > Parties to a contract SHALL act in accordance with that > contract. This obligation is not impaired by contradiction > between the contract and any other contract, or between the > contract and the rules. > > As it is manifestly unjust to bring criminal punishment into a > manner of equity, if a player is found GUILTY of violating this > Rule by failing to act in accordance with a contract that has > never been a partnership, the only appropriate sentence is > DISCHARGE, unless said failure is with respect to a > previously-imposed Equity judgement. > > with this text: > > Parties to a contract SHALL act in accordance with that > contract. This obligation is not impaired by contradiction > between the contract and any other contract, or between the > contract and the rules. However, if a player is found GUILTY > of violating this rule by failing to act in accordance with > an Equitable contract, then the only appropriate sentence is > DISCHARGE, unless the failure pertains to a previously-imposed > equity judgement.
Wait, what? -coppro
