On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Taral wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 5:35 PM, omd wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Taral wrote:
>>> 9. omd is the Pariah, and Rule 2312 applies to all players, including
>>> judges.
>>
>> No I'm not.
>
> Oh? I was pretty sure I checked the records...
On 09/19/2010 08:57 PM, Taral wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 5:40 PM, omd wrote:
I intend to appeal this with two support. I believe that this
judgement is correct, but should clarify that failing to check did not
actually absolve coppro of any liability were eir original belief in
Wooble's IA
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Taral wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 5:35 PM, omd wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Taral wrote:
>>> 9. omd is the Pariah, and Rule 2312 applies to all players, including
>>> judges.
>>
>> No I'm not.
>
> Oh? I was pretty sure I checked the records...
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 5:40 PM, omd wrote:
> I intend to appeal this with two support. I believe that this
> judgement is correct, but should clarify that failing to check did not
> actually absolve coppro of any liability were eir original belief in
> Wooble's IADoP-ness not quite so certain.
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 5:35 PM, omd wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Taral wrote:
>> 9. omd is the Pariah, and Rule 2312 applies to all players, including judges.
>
> No I'm not.
Oh? I was pretty sure I checked the records... things must have
changed on me. Thankfully it's not germane
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Taral wrote:
> 9. omd is the Pariah, and Rule 2312 applies to all players, including judges.
No I'm not.
Am Montag, den 20.09.2010, 01:10 +0200 schrieb Keba:
> Am Sonntag, den 19.09.2010, 15:48 -0700 schrieb Taral:
> > On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Taral wrote:
> > > The question on culpability in CFJ 2860 is judged NOT GUILTY by 1504(d).
> >
> > I award myself 2 capacitors for this judgement.
>
Tanner L. Swett wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 1:44 AM, comex wrote:
>> Proposal: Erratification
>>
>> Ratify the following incorrect document: { 1 + 1 = 3 }
>
> The definition: "When a public document is ratified, the gamestate is
> minimally modified so that the ratified document was complet
Am Sonntag, den 19.09.2010, 15:48 -0700 schrieb Taral:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Taral wrote:
> > The question on culpability in CFJ 2860 is judged NOT GUILTY by 1504(d).
>
> I award myself 2 capacitors for this judgement.
>
Fails, the II of the CFJ is one, so you could have award your
On 09/19/2010 10:38 AM, ais523 wrote:
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 15:14 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
I destroy a Rest in my possession. This costs me some ergs.
Were you on 24 for a moment there?
I do not believe so.
-coppro
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 1:44 AM, comex wrote:
> Proposal: Erratification
>
> Ratify the following incorrect document: { 1 + 1 = 3 }
The definition: "When a public document is ratified, the gamestate is
minimally modified so that the ratified document was completely true
and accurate at the time i
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 15:14 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I destroy a Rest in my possession. This costs me some ergs.
Were you on 24 for a moment there?
--
ais523
12 matches
Mail list logo
