DIS: Re: BUS: Assumption bug

2010-09-15 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Keba wrote: > Additionally, I don't understand why G. do not want to post eir Rest > record, if e already collected information on it. Without rancor, I'm exploring the end product/consequences of that loophole; which is a follow-up loophole that an officer can hold infor

DIS: Re: BUS: Assumption bug

2010-09-15 Thread omd
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Keba wrote: > So we should either add some rewards or make ergs more useful. Perhaps > the main problem is we don't have a real goal to aim for. Any ideas for > adding some sub-game again? How about making Fans only increase based on unused ergs?

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: a-rest-ing

2010-09-15 Thread Keba
Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Tue, 7 Sep 2010, Keba wrote: > > [Generally, this could be done by the CotC very well, but both the CotC > > and the Herald got to do too many jobs, so we are ready for a new > > office.] > > I agree, but let me offer a puzzle. Refactor the following jobs into > three offi

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6842-6846

2010-09-15 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > FOR all of these. (but my voting limit is 0 anyway?) I believe this batch was all made Democratic, so your voting limit is 1.