On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Keba wrote:
> Additionally, I don't understand why G. do not want to post eir Rest
> record, if e already collected information on it.
Without rancor, I'm exploring the end product/consequences of that
loophole; which is a follow-up loophole that an officer can hold
information hostage. Call it counter-play to the scam (We seem to be
in a big loophole-exploitation phase at the moment).
Assumption also allows two people to regularly switch offices and not
ever have a weekly report due, or witness Yally holding an office until
the last minute (for nearly two weeks as Granulator?) and being able to
resign with no penalty. Here's an update of an old rule we used to
have, feel free to implement:
When an officer ceases to hold an office, e SHALL, asap, make a
reasonable attempt to publish all records related to that office
as they stood at the moment of eir ceasing to hold it. Failure
to do so is the Class-S crime of Shredding the Files, where S is
the interest index of the office.
Otherwise I think the awards, once the bug is fixed, are sufficient.
I don't really think further benefits are needed.
-G.
ps. dropped in on IRC a few times this week but didn't happen to see
you and I couldn't stay long; quite possibly we are merely time-zone
challenged.
