On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Keba wrote:
> comex wrote (in the section of the Prop rule):
>> At the beginning of each Agoran Week, two props are destroyed in
>> the possession of each player who did not transfer one of their
>> props to another player in the previous week. If
On Sat, 4 Sep 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 09/04/2010 07:28 PM, ais523 wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 01:24 +0200, Keba wrote:
> > > ais523 wrote:
> > > > I do not rebel, nor plan to rebel. I didn't plan to anyway, but you want
> > > > to explicitly reward this for some reason...
> > >
> > > We
On 09/04/2010 07:28 PM, ais523 wrote:
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 01:24 +0200, Keba wrote:
ais523 wrote:
I do not rebel, nor plan to rebel. I didn't plan to anyway, but you want
to explicitly reward this for some reason...
Well, I want to get the Leadership Token and need to react to G's offer.
I d
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 01:24 +0200, Keba wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
> > I do not rebel, nor plan to rebel. I didn't plan to anyway, but you want
> > to explicitly reward this for some reason...
>
> Well, I want to get the Leadership Token and need to react to G's offer.
> I don't care much about the or
ais523 wrote:
> I do not rebel, nor plan to rebel. I didn't plan to anyway, but you want
> to explicitly reward this for some reason...
Well, I want to get the Leadership Token and need to react to G's offer.
I don't care much about the ordering, I even offered you to become K.S
Supervisor for hel
Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Sat, 4 Sep 2010, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > I rebel. Down with the, er... -G.
>
> For everyone who rebels after this message, if the rebellion
> fails, I'll destroy their rebellion rest (at the rate of
> 2 rests total destroyed per week until they're gone). -G.
If the re
LIST OF SUCCESSION
[1] Last crowning due to Mark: Spitemaster 4 Sep 2010 16:30:41 GMT
[2] Last crowning due to Promotion: Keba 5 Sep 2010 02:44:34 GMT
[3] *Last bestowing of favors: none never
Last Rebellion began:5 Sep 2010 02:44:34 GM
On Sat, 4 Sep 2010, Alex Smith wrote:
> I become inactive.
Heh, I was about to push you up there too... only reason
I didn't was I thought it impolite to do it so soon after
posting the list as herald. Oh well... that opens the
season I suppose. -G.
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> 6826 P 0 3.1 coppro Quadruple Oops
> AGAINST (unneeded, R1688 "Threshold defaults to the securing Rule's
> Power")
It was upmutated by a different proposal.
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 2:34 PM, omd wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2851a
>
> AFFIRM without prejudice
I just remembered that I actually destroyed those 3 rests, but if the
appellant isn't going to explain th
On Sat, 4 Sep 2010, ais523 wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 10:54 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > The only unmarked (Wooble, Keba, Epaeris) were not players at
> > the time of these wins. I don't believe these three have
> > otherwise won the game since March 4, 2010 (six months ago).
>
> Being in
On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 10:54 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> The only unmarked (Wooble, Keba, Epaeris) were not players at
> the time of these wins. I don't believe these three have
> otherwise won the game since March 4, 2010 (six months ago).
Being inactive within the last week is (and IIRC was the
Wooble wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> It strikes me that when an officer ends up unresigned and inactive, the
>> office gets stuck. Is this right currently? Should we amend deputisation
>> to allow for inactive offices, not just vacant? (and are there other pla
13 matches
Mail list logo
