On Sat, 4 Sep 2010, Sean Hunt wrote: > On 09/04/2010 07:28 PM, ais523 wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 01:24 +0200, Keba wrote: > > > ais523 wrote: > > > > I do not rebel, nor plan to rebel. I didn't plan to anyway, but you want > > > > to explicitly reward this for some reason... > > > > > > Well, I want to get the Leadership Token and need to react to G's offer. > > > I don't care much about the ordering, I even offered you to become K.S > > > Supervisor for helping me out here, but you declined indirectly. > > > > > > As G has retract eir offer, I retract my offer as well. I forgot about > > > FSCN, of course it's members could and should take advantage of this > > > "scam". Additionally, bribes of one prop are also not bad, if you want > > > to jump up, of course ;) > > > > I dislike the concept of using props for bribery; they used to just be a > > voluntary thing tracked separately from the rules. I'm vaguely annoyed > > that they even have a game effect... > > > > I concur.
The very old version of Props had game effects; the simple solution was that with the 1/week limit, if you see someone using it for bribes, you simply correct the balance with advantage until they stop doing so. -G.
