Wooble wrote: > On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >> It strikes me that when an officer ends up unresigned and inactive, the >> office gets stuck. Is this right currently? Should we amend deputisation >> to allow for inactive offices, not just vacant? (and are there other places >> to add same, election procedure etc.)? >> >> [This is not to say you won't come back as soon as you can coppro, this >> just made me notice the bug in general]. > > When an officer becomes inactive, all of eir offices become Assumed. > Anyone can assume the office, and even immediately resign it if it > seems likely that things will get done by deputization more > efficiently when the office is empty.
*rereads R1006* Okay, you're right, the *office* needs to be elected (not imposed), but the holder can be either postulated or assumed.
