DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of Proposal 6796

2010-08-23 Thread omd
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Sean Hunt wrote: > Also, you cannot do this, as Wooble CAN legally distribute a proposal. Not this one.

Re: DIS: annotating the ruleset (for new players)

2010-08-23 Thread omd
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Alex Smith wrote: >> --- On Mon, 23/8/10, comex wrote: >> > http://agora.qoid.us/current_flr.html?annotate=1 > > Ambiguous annotations found so far: Fixed most of these.

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: PM protosal

2010-08-23 Thread Ed Murphy
Keba wrote: > On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:53:40 -0400, Geoffrey Spear > wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Sgeo wrote: CoE: You also do not have enough ergs to do this. >>> >>> Enough ergs to discuss something? >> >> Well, it was labelled "distributable via fee". > > ... and the mail's

Re: DIS: PM protosal

2010-08-23 Thread Ed Murphy
G. wrote: >> The physicist is an office and should be held by the PM. Its weekly >> report contains how often and by whom the PM has been powered, who is the >> Energy Spender and a list of all bot-PM actions of the previous seven days. > > If the PM holds this office, no real person would be

Re: DIS: PM protosal

2010-08-23 Thread Ed Murphy
Keba wrote: > Is this similar to the AFO? I have not read the proposal/rule of that > player, because I did not want to get inspirated by it, I want to create > something different. The AFO was a contract-based legal person that any member of the contract could control at any time by announcement

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Shame!

2010-08-23 Thread Ed Murphy
Keba wrote: > On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 05:09:12 -0700, Ed Murphy > wrote: >> 6783-89 are going to fail quorum about 30 hours from now, as only >> four players coppro, Murphy, Wooble, Yally) have voted on them. >> >> Active but not voted: >> ais523, ehird, G., Keba, omd, Sgeo, Tanner L. Swett, Tiger

DIS: Re: BUS: Not a cronjob

2010-08-23 Thread Warrigal
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > I change my nickname to 'The Robot'. > > -coppro I publish a Notice of Violation accusing coppro of violating rule 2170 (power 3) by changing eir nickname to "The Robot", a confusing nickname. —Accuser Tanner L. Swett

Re: DIS: PM protosal

2010-08-23 Thread Sean Hunt
On 08/23/2010 05:21 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, ag...@kebay.org wrote: On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:11:32 -0700 (PDT), Kerim Aydin wrote: This violates R101(vii). The only way I can think to get around it (it has come up before for other non-natural players) is to re-define R1

Re: DIS: PM protosal

2010-08-23 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, ag...@kebay.org wrote: > On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:11:32 -0700 (PDT), Kerim Aydin > wrote: > > This violates R101(vii). The only way I can think to get around it (it > has > > come up before for other non-natural players) is to re-define R101 so > that > > rights apply to "na

Re: DIS: PM protosal

2010-08-23 Thread Keba
Oh my god, the mail looks terrible, I'm sorry. Switched to an email client, should be better in the future ;) -- Keba

Re: DIS: PM protosal

2010-08-23 Thread agora
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:11:32 -0700 (PDT), Kerim Aydin wrote: > This violates R101(vii). The only way I can think to get around it (it has > come up before for other non-natural players) is to re-define R101 so that > rights apply to "natural persons" only. This is probably a good idea > anyway >

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: PM protosal

2010-08-23 Thread agora
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:53:40 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Sgeo wrote: >>> CoE: You also do not have enough ergs to do this. >> >> Enough ergs to discuss something? > > Well, it was labelled "distributable via fee". ... and the mail's subject was/is "PM protos

DIS: Re: BUS: No unnatural rights

2010-08-23 Thread omd
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >       BE IT HEREBY PROCLAIMED that no interpretation of Agoran law or >       binding agreement may substantially limit or remove a natural >       person's rights as defined by this Rule, except through the >       explicit and legal amendment

Re: DIS: and another

2010-08-23 Thread Sean Hunt
On 08/23/2010 12:38 PM, Alex Smith wrote: --- On Mon, 23/8/10, Sean Hunt wrote: I hope things are working now I conclude on general principles that you're planning a timing scam, and am wondering what it is. I was testing email filters, actually. It's the first time I've used procmail an

Re: DIS: annotating the ruleset (for new players)

2010-08-23 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Alex Smith wrote: > --- On Mon, 23/8/10, comex wrote: > > http://agora.qoid.us/current_flr.html?annotate=1 Ambiguous annotations found so far: class (crime, type of asset; first-class second-class) title (multiple uses) legal (e.g. first sentence R649) basis (R2255 MwoP def

Re: DIS: and another

2010-08-23 Thread Alex Smith
--- On Mon, 23/8/10, Sean Hunt wrote: > I hope things are working now I conclude on general principles that you're planning a timing scam, and am wondering what it is. -- ais523

Re: DIS: annotating the ruleset (for new players)

2010-08-23 Thread Alex Smith
--- On Mon, 23/8/10, comex wrote: > http://agora.qoid.us/current_flr.html?annotate=1 > > Probably broken on IE and/or in general. Seems to work on the Firefox on this computer. This should probably be made the default, if and when it's fully tested. -- ais523

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: PM protosal

2010-08-23 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Sgeo wrote: >> CoE: You also do not have enough ergs to do this. > > Enough ergs to discuss something? Well, it was labelled "distributable via fee".

Re: DIS: annotating the ruleset (for new players)

2010-08-23 Thread Elliott Hird
Also, "Title" is annotated in places where it shouldn't be; e.g. "Title of Rule".

Re: DIS: annotating the ruleset (for new players)

2010-08-23 Thread Elliott Hird
"Dangerousness" is silly. Perhaps just say that higher-powered rules can do more stuff to the game state?

Re: DIS: PM protosal

2010-08-23 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, ag...@kebay.org wrote: > Proposal "A Perpepuum mobile is possible" (AI=2, II=2, distributable via > fee) > > {{{ > Enact a new Rule with power=2 entitled "Perpepuum mobile": > > The Perpepuum mobile (PM) is a person and active player. The PM cannot > be deregistered o

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: PM protosal

2010-08-23 Thread Sgeo
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 19:24, wrote: >> >> Proposal "A Perpepuum mobile is possible" (AI=2, II=2, distributable via >> fee) >> >> {{{ >> Enact a new Rule with power=2 entitled "Perpepuum mobile": >> >>    The Perpepuum mobile (PM) is

Re: DIS: yet another test mail

2010-08-23 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Sean Hunt wrote: > arrr > > -coppro Sept 19th is weeks away.

Re: DIS: One more

2010-08-23 Thread omd
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 4:37 AM, Sean Hunt wrote: > Okay, last go for now. I promise this will end, whether it works or not. > > Hopefully using the correct filename will work. > > -coppro > Predicting timing scam.

Re: DIS: One more

2010-08-23 Thread Sean Hunt
On 08/23/2010 02:35 AM, Sean Hunt wrote: On 08/23/2010 02:31 AM, Sean Hunt wrote: sorry for spamming. -coppro yep. I ain't done yet :( getting this to work is annoyinger than I thought. -coppro Okay, last go for now. I promise this will end, whether it works or not. Hopefully using the co

Re: DIS: One more

2010-08-23 Thread Sean Hunt
On 08/23/2010 02:31 AM, Sean Hunt wrote: sorry for spamming. -coppro yep. I ain't done yet :( getting this to work is annoyinger than I thought. -coppro

DIS: One more

2010-08-23 Thread Sean Hunt
sorry for spamming. -coppro

DIS: and another

2010-08-23 Thread Sean Hunt
I hope things are working now

DIS: yet another test mail

2010-08-23 Thread Sean Hunt
arrr -coppro