coppro wrote:
>> 6541 1 2.0 Murphy Flowers for Wooble
> AGAINST. Should only apply to proposals in the Proposal Pool.
Ah, right, removing a proposal from the pool doesn't cause it to
cease being a proposal. (Why not? There's currently no mechanism
to put a removed proposal back
I'm reminded of invisiblegames.net, especially the Lenentine Cards.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Taral wrote:
> They suck. That is all.
c
They suck. That is all.
--
Taral
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
Sean Hunt wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
If I have at least as many Distrib-u-Matics as undistributable proposals
in the pool, then for each such proposal, I play Distrib-u-Matic to make
it distributable.
Having worked things back through the history, I can conclusively say
this failed.
-coppro
An
Ed Murphy wrote:
If I have at least as many Distrib-u-Matics as undistributable proposals
in the pool, then for each such proposal, I play Distrib-u-Matic to make
it distributable.
Having worked things back through the history, I can conclusively say
this failed.
-coppro
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I completely agree that you did not attempt to declare war.
>
> However, the citizenry (or one of them, anyways) decided otherwise,
> and would have judged a state a war to have existed if e could have.
> As a result, I ask that B Nomic be put un
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I've a new experiment to try:
> {{
>
> This is a Public Equitable pledge named "Happy Times"
Just as long as it doesn't have a with-notice amendment mechanism
--
-c.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
> True, why not. I consent. (dunno if it's required)\
It is.
-coppro
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> I think this would be more interesting is you didn't have the 'as e
> sees fit', and instead there was some equity court-enforcible standard
> for awarding the points.
>
> Also, I've always wanted to see a Legalistic contest which was its ow
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I've a new experiment to try:
>
> {{
>
> This is a Public Equitable pledge named "Happy Times"
>
> If this contract is a contest, its contestmaster SHALL award points if
> and as e sees fit, but CANNOT award them to emself. Otherwise, all
> part
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Charles Walker
>>> wrote:
Friendly B Nomic
(http://www.nomic.net/
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Charles Walker
>> wrote:
>>> Friendly B Nomic
>>> (http://www.nomic.net/~nomicwiki/index.php/B%20Nomic)
>>
>> I humbly request the A
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>> Friendly B Nomic
>> (http://www.nomic.net/~nomicwiki/index.php/B%20Nomic)
>
> I humbly request the Ambassador flip the Recognition of B Nomic to
> Sanctioned in lig
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> Friendly B Nomic
> (http://www.nomic.net/~nomicwiki/index.php/B%20Nomic)
I humbly request the Ambassador flip the Recognition of B Nomic to
Sanctioned in light of eir near-success at a declaration of war.
I wrote:
> Proposal: Clarify emergency distribution
> (AI = 3, please)
>
> Amend Rule 106 (Adopting Proposals) by replacing this text:
>
> If the Rules do not otherwise permit at least one current active
> player to distribute a Proposal, then any player may do so
> Without 3
Wooble wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> FYI: B's war judgement declared ineffective on a technicality. (I was
>> trying to appeal it on the grounds that the persons behind it didn't
>> discuss it in Agora first, nor use their Agoran roles in executing it.)
>
> I'd
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:09 AM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> I deposit 3 * WRV for 390zm.
I think this affects my later withdrawal.
--
Taral
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
A friend on an RPG forum wrote this, and I felt that I should share it
with nomicers. The only ones I know are the Agorans and the Bns (and
I'm not even very active there anymore), so here you go. It's about a
game mentioned by name and described only as "being about creating and
interpreting the g
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> FYI: B's war judgement declared ineffective on a technicality. (I was
> trying to appeal it on the grounds that the persons behind it didn't
> discuss it in Agora first, nor use their Agoran roles in executing it.)
I'd argue that if the Admira
FYI: B's war judgement declared ineffective on a technicality. (I was
trying to appeal it on the grounds that the persons behind it didn't
discuss it in Agora first, nor use their Agoran roles in executing it.)
Original Message
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:10:30 +
From: 0x44
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:58 AM, comex wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Alex Smith
> wrote:
>>> I support.
>>
>> And with 2 support, I do so.
>
> I become hemming-and-hawing and sitting, favor this case, and disfavor
> all other judicial cases.
Note that the favoring/disfavoring of ap
Also, CFJ 2055 (thanks ais523)
ais523 wrote:
> And with 2 support, I do so.
NttPF
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:57 PM, comex wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:27 AM, comex wrote:
>>> It is, in fact, POSSIBLE to transfer Rests to the Lost and Found
>>> Department, by ceasing to be a person. (The question is, does such
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:27 AM, comex wrote:
>> It is, in fact, POSSIBLE to transfer Rests to the Lost and Found
>> Department, by ceasing to be a person. (The question is, does such an
>> unreasonable method of action satisfy a CAN-san
--- On Tue, 20/10/09, Charles Walker wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:53 PM,
> Alex Smith
>
> wrote:
> > I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this. Without
> being able to see coppro's reasoning, I have no idea whether
> eir judgement is correct or not, and therefore no basis upon
> which to de
2009/10/20 Geoffrey Spear :
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:27 AM, comex wrote:
>> It is, in fact, POSSIBLE to transfer Rests to the Lost and Found
>> Department, by ceasing to be a person. (The question is, does such an
>> unreasonable method of action satisfy a CAN-sans-mechanism clause?)
>
> One
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:27 AM, comex wrote:
> It is, in fact, POSSIBLE to transfer Rests to the Lost and Found
> Department, by ceasing to be a person. (The question is, does such an
> unreasonable method of action satisfy a CAN-sans-mechanism clause?)
One second after sending this message, I
It is, in fact, POSSIBLE to transfer Rests to the Lost and Found
Department, by ceasing to be a person. (The question is, does such an
unreasonable method of action satisfy a CAN-sans-mechanism clause?)
--
-c.
2009/10/20 comex :
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 4:04 AM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>> I intend, without objection, to transfer 4 Distrib-u-matics from the
>> L&F department to the IBA.
>>
>> I intend, without objection, to make Yally inactive.
>
> I object.
>
> --
> -c.
>
To both announcements of inten
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 4:09 AM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 8:45 PM, comex wrote:
>>> ===
>>>
>>> Industrial Bank & Agora Report
>
>> CoE:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 8:45 PM, comex wrote:
>> ===
>>
>> Industrial Bank & Agora Report
> CoE: You are missing my recent withdraws and deposits. Look for 'BUS:
>
33 matches
Mail list logo
