DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2695 assigned to Pavitra

2009-09-23 Thread Pavitra
Draft, TTDF on purpose. > == CFJ 2695 == > > c. awarded emself 70 x-points via the Contract B contest. > > > > Caller's Arguments: > > My intent when writing

DIS: Re: BUS: Pledge

2009-09-23 Thread Pavitra
ais523 wrote: >> Any party (the actor) CAN act on behalf of a party (the grantor) whose >> membership is full by announcement, except to intend or agree to make >> Contract Changes to this contract, but SHALL NOT do so except in the >> following cases: >> >> - as would be POSSIBLE if not for this

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Not really up to the task

2009-09-23 Thread Pavitra
Roger Hicks wrote: > For each Dealor (other than BobTHJ) who is a member of this contract: > BobTHJ CAN and SHALL act on behalf of that Dealor to: No time limit; arguably this SHALL is violated iff the Dealor get there first. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Darth Cliche reregisters

2009-09-23 Thread Pavitra
Alex Smith wrote: > --- On Tue, 22/9/09, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> From: Kerim Aydin Subject: DIS: Re: BUS: >> Darth Cliche reregisters To: "Agora Discussion" >> Date: Tuesday, 22 September, >> 2009, 10:20 PM >> >> On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Kenner Gordon wrote: >>> I register. >> >> I... er... my goodn

DIS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJs 2674a,b ass igned to ais523, c., Murphy, ə, Walker

2009-09-23 Thread Sean Hunt
comex wrote: On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: Appellant BobTHJ's Arguments: I appeal this case. By custom Agora has permitted new officers a full ASAP period to fulfill outstanding obligations.

DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJs 2674a,b assigned to ais523, c., Murphy, ə, Walker

2009-09-23 Thread comex
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > > > Appellant BobTHJ's Arguments: > > I appeal this case. By custom Agora has permitted new officers a full > ASAP period to fulfill outstanding obligations. > > ===

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6495-6501

2009-09-23 Thread Ed Murphy
BobTHJ wrote: >> 6498 O 0 1.0 c. I want to be Justiciar again! This was democratized, you can vote on it if you want.

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Grand Poobah] Deck of Government report

2009-09-23 Thread Roger Hicks
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:24, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > 2009/9/23 Roger Hicks : >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 15:06, Jonatan Kilhamn >> wrote: >>> c-walker*                        7  1  0  1  1  1  1  0  0    11 >> >> CoE: (and I realize you indicate this eir holdings are in dispute) >>>

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Intent to ditch the Points Party

2009-09-23 Thread comex
Sent from my iPhone On Sep 23, 2009, at 1:54 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: (and as an aside, maybe such a far-reaching win should close off the era of complex contracts in Agora). Only if it works!

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Intent to ditch the Points Party

2009-09-23 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, comex wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Elliott Hird > wrote: >> 2009/9/23 Alex Smith : >>> I didn't; I also claimed that I would try to punish players who >>> attempted to object by stealing/destroying assets... >> >> I said I'd only use the mousetrap for a dictat

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Darth Cliche reregisters

2009-09-23 Thread comex
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Alex Smith wrote: > Arguments: "I register" does not necessarily indicate intent to register, on > the basis that the person in question might have been lying. (Compare the > recent message by G., where G. stated that e intended to register without > actually i

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Intent to ditch the Points Party

2009-09-23 Thread comex
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Elliott Hird wrote: > 2009/9/23 Alex Smith : >> I didn't; I also claimed that I would try to punish players who attempted to >> object by stealing/destroying assets, which is what I'm doing here. I think >> your misquote of me is bordering on illegal. > > I sai

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Intent to ditch the Points Party

2009-09-23 Thread Elliott Hird
2009/9/23 Alex Smith : > I didn't; I also claimed that I would try to punish players who attempted to > object by stealing/destroying assets, which is what I'm doing here. I think > your misquote of me is bordering on illegal. I said I'd only use the mousetrap for a dictatorship proposal, and t

DIS: Re: BUS: Intent to ditch the Points Party

2009-09-23 Thread Alex Smith
--- On Wed, 23/9/09, Elliott Hird wrote: > You're a damn immoral liar, claiming that your mousetrap > would only be > used for that proposal to me. > > Shame. I didn't; I also claimed that I would try to punish players who attempted to object by stealing/destroying assets, which is what I'm doin

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Not really up to the task

2009-09-23 Thread Elliott Hird
2009/9/23 comex : > Sent from my iPhone I hear that thing can run Mono. Hey, I trust your phone more than BobTHJ's server :-P

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Not really up to the task

2009-09-23 Thread comex
want to bet? Sent from my iPhone On Sep 23, 2009, at 9:05 AM, Elliott Hird > wrote: 2009/9/23 comex : http://www.mono-project.com/ASP.NET http://www.mono-project.com/Visual_Basic Presumably, both are not yet perfect, and it's perfectly possible his application wouldn't run on them (especia

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Not really up to the task

2009-09-23 Thread Elliott Hird
2009/9/23 comex : > http://www.mono-project.com/ASP.NET > http://www.mono-project.com/Visual_Basic Presumably, both are not yet perfect, and it's perfectly possible his application wouldn't run on them (especially the ASP.NET).

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Not really up to the task

2009-09-23 Thread comex
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Elliott Hird wrote: > 2009/9/22 Roger Hicks : >> Until I can complete the process of making it an open >> application (for everyone to use) > > Everyone willing to use (and if it doesn't work with Mono, pay for > (even with Mono, ASP.NET must still be used, which i

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Not really up to the task

2009-09-23 Thread Roger Hicks
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 04:57, Elliott Hird wrote: > 2009/9/22 Roger Hicks : >> Until I can complete the process of making it an open >> application (for everyone to use) > > Everyone willing to use (and if it doesn't work with Mono, pay for > (even with Mono, ASP.NET must still be used, which is,

Re: DIS: Not really up to the task

2009-09-23 Thread Roger Hicks
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 04:54, Elliott Hird wrote: > 2009/9/22 Roger Hicks : >> However, because of the automation when it reveals an error >> the perfectionist in me requires that I CoE. > > This amounts to a claim that the automation is perfect, no? > Not hardlyit only means that the automat

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Not really up to the task

2009-09-23 Thread Elliott Hird
2009/9/22 Roger Hicks : > Until I can complete the process of making it an open > application (for everyone to use) Everyone willing to use (and if it doesn't work with Mono, pay for (even with Mono, ASP.NET must still be used, which is, iirc, proprietary)) proprietary software, you mean. I'm not

Re: DIS: Not really up to the task

2009-09-23 Thread Elliott Hird
2009/9/22 Roger Hicks : > However, because of the automation when it reveals an error > the perfectionist in me requires that I CoE. This amounts to a claim that the automation is perfect, no?