On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:24, Jonatan Kilhamn <jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/9/23 Roger Hicks <pidge...@gmail.com>: >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 15:06, Jonatan Kilhamn >> <jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> c-walker* 7 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 11 >>>>>> >>>>>> CoE: (and I realize you indicate this eir holdings are in dispute) >>>>>> C-walker has 5 Roll Calls and an On the Nod, no other cards. >>>>> Denied, from where would e get an On the Nod? >>>>> >>>> E's had it since before is audit, it wasn't destroyed in the audit, >>>> and e hasn't played it since. >>>> >>>> I re-CoE: Walker has one On the Nod card. >>>> >>> Umm... Walker never had any On the Nod in any of coppro's reports and >>> hasn't had any in mine, and you never CoE'd on it (those reports >>> haven't ratified anyway, but still). My history sections also don't >>> show em gaining any. I ask again, where would e get an On the nod? >>> Denied. >>> >> The July 25th report (which ratified) shows Walker with an On the Nod. >> Each subsequent report you've issued since then (with the exception of >> the Sept 17 report) shows Walker with one On the Nod. You may want to >> check this again. I re-re-CoE this. >> > Epic reading failure, I kept looking for No Confidence cards. My bad. > However, the On the Nod was indeed included in the auditing > randomization table and was destroyed in the audit. Denied yet again. > And failure on my part to record the On the Nod being destroyed. Sorry for trouble, thanks for working through this with me.
BobTHJ
