On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Elliott Hird <penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote: > 2009/9/23 Alex Smith <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk>: >> I didn't; I also claimed that I would try to punish players who attempted to >> object by stealing/destroying assets, which is what I'm doing here. I think >> your misquote of me is bordering on illegal. > > <ais523> I said I'd only use the mousetrap for a dictatorship > proposal, and to punish objectors by stealing/destroying assets > <ais523> which is what I did > <ehird> You did not say that to me. > <ais523> I don't have my logs on this computer > <ais523> but I'm relatively sure I told you that > <ais523> I'll look it up later
How about you actually look it up before accusing ais523 of lying? You had warning, and ais523 made a clear distinction between Punished and non-Punished players. The terminology might be a little excessive, but you could have avoided it by not objecting. I'm saying this as a Punished person-- or, a person who would be Punished if ais523's scam worked-- if it did work, I got myself into it. A dictator stealing everyone's assets might not be in the best spirit of the game, but it's not really against the spirit either as long as it's temporary. If you can poke a hole in eir scam (e.g. prosecute em for more of eir false intents) do so, otherwise shut up, or don't have objected. -- -c.
