Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Intent to ditch the Points Party

Roger Hicks wrote: > Proto: Criminalize Ambiguity > { > Create a new rule with the text: > {{ > Knowingly compounding an ambiguous gamestate is the class 4 crime of > Muddying the Waters. > }} > } Criminality dependent on intent is almost, but not quite, as bad as gamestate ambiguity, and for not

DIS: Re: OFF: [Grand Poobah] Government officials' salaries

2009/9/21 Jonatan Kilhamn : > To Ambassador C-walker: > Debate-o-matic Of course I mean to Ambassador Walker, sorry about the copy-paste error. -- -Tiger

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Insulator Election

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > What happens when you play a NC on an office for which there's an > ongoing election? The election in canceled and a new one starts.

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Insulator Election

2009/9/21 Roger Hicks : > On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 17:47, Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: >>> The candidates are: coppro, BobTHJ. >> >> I cast a conditional vote endorsing coppro if the IADoP election in >> progress at the time this vote is being cast has

Re: DIS: Not really up to the task

2009/9/21 Roger Hicks : > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 13:38, Jonatan Kilhamn > wrote: >> Card recordkeeping was harder than I thought. As you might have >> noticed, I have not yet produced a single correct report and as I >> don't see what I'm doing to get several things wrong every time, I >> probabl

DIS: nomic.bob-space.com status update

Recent updates: * Hand limits now show on the HTML Accountor's report * Airstrip One report now available in HTML form * Disclaimer for the "Recent Reports" section to explain "Ratified" * Many minor bugs fixed

Re: DIS: Not really up to the task

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 13:42, Roger Hicks wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 13:38, Jonatan Kilhamn > wrote: >> Card recordkeeping was harder than I thought. As you might have >> noticed, I have not yet produced a single correct report and as I >> don't see what I'm doing to get several things wro

Re: DIS: Not really up to the task

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 13:38, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > Card recordkeeping was harder than I thought. As you might have > noticed, I have not yet produced a single correct report and as I > don't see what I'm doing to get several things wrong every time, I > probably won't be able to do much bette

DIS: Not really up to the task

Card recordkeeping was harder than I thought. As you might have noticed, I have not yet produced a single correct report and as I don't see what I'm doing to get several things wrong every time, I probably won't be able to do much better. If anyone wants the office, I'd be happy to resign. If not,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: BobTHJ's Actions (automated)

2009/9/21 Roger Hicks : > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 05:09, Sean Hunt wrote: >> pidge...@gmail.com wrote: >>> >>> { >>> coppro is dealt the following card(s) from the deck of Change: Presto!, >>> Committee, Committee, Supersize Me >>> } >>> Reason: Proposals 6487 and 6490 >> >> I play Supersize Me, i

Re: DIS: My Reports

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:26, comex wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Roger Hicks wrote: >> I hereby formally apologize to the Agoran community for not issuing >> reports for my offices during last week. I ended up being in the >> hospital for over a day (my wife was in labor) which suck

Re: DIS: My Reports

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Roger Hicks wrote: > I hereby formally apologize to the Agoran community for not issuing > reports for my offices during last week. I ended up being in the > hospital for over a day (my wife was in labor) which sucked most of my > free time out of last week. Congr

DIS: My Reports

I hereby formally apologize to the Agoran community for not issuing reports for my offices during last week. I ended up being in the hospital for over a day (my wife was in labor) which sucked most of my free time out of last week. If anyone wishes to penalize me for this, you are certainly within

DIS: Re: BUS: Revolving the door

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 09:21, Warrigal wrote: > I register. > NOTE (attn Tiger): Warrigal is still owed 2 draws from each deck from eir last registration, plus the 2 e just earned. Now that e is registered again it is possible to make those draws. BobTHJ

DIS: Re: BUS: Scam #2

comex wrote: > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: >> CFJ, disqualifying ais523: ais523 has amended the Fantasy Rules Contest >> contract within the past 24 hours. > > I make this II-1. It already was, or am I missing something? > I intend, without 3 objections, to make it II-2.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: BAK: Yay for dependent action scams

On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, ais523 wrote: > The important point behind giving notice is that it allows someone to > react. The relevant point about the Points Party was that I planned to > change the contract; and the contract allows parties to respond to a > planned change by leaving the contract. The m

DIS: Re: BUS: The fundamental point that everyone is missing, part 2

On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 14:13, ais523 wrote: > I play Penalty Box to audit Murphy. > If this was successful it created 10 rests in Murphy's possession (Murphy had 55 cards, 48 over hand limit). BobTHJ

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: The fundamental point that everyone is missing, part 2

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 10:46, ais523 wrote: > On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 10:44 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 14:13, ais523 wrote: >> > I play Penalty Box to audit Murphy. >> > >> Fails as far as I can tell. With Notice is defined in the rules and >> requires a minimum of 4 days

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: The fundamental point that everyone is missing, part 2

On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 10:44 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote: > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 14:13, ais523 wrote: > > I play Penalty Box to audit Murphy. > > > Fails as far as I can tell. With Notice is defined in the rules and > requires a minimum of 4 days. > I gave arguments about this afterwards. With Not

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: BAK: Yay for dependent action scams

On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 20:55 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Sun, 20 Sep 2009, ais523 wrote: > >> I still don't think I'm incorrect. Giving notice that I plan to do > >> something via means X is still giving notice that I plan to do it; it's > >> a logical implication. See also CFJ 2624, which also

DIS: Re: BUS: The fundamental point that everyone is missing, part 2

On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 14:13, ais523 wrote: > I play Penalty Box to audit Murphy. > Fails as far as I can tell. With Notice is defined in the rules and requires a minimum of 4 days. BobTHJ

DIS: Re: BUS: One more

On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 06:23, Ed Murphy wrote: > I leave C# Party (revised version).  (Disclaimer:  This only works if > at least one of ais523's scam attempts has triggered its "any party to > the contract can leave it" clause, which was designed to give Quazie > the same sort of amendment-with-

DIS: Re: BUS: BobTHJ's Actions (automated)

On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 05:09, Sean Hunt wrote: > pidge...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> { >> coppro is dealt the following card(s) from the deck of Change: Presto!, >> Committee, Committee, Supersize Me >> } >> Reason: Proposals 6487 and 6490 > > I play Supersize Me, indicating coppro. > I play Presto!,

DIS: Re: BUS: No Confidence

On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 11:25 -0400, comex wrote: > I play No Confidence, specifying Notary. > I nominate myself and BobTHJ as Notary. > Fair enough. I'm willing to give Notary to someone else if they're willing to do all the work; the reason I took the job in the first place was that nobody else w

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: BAK: Yay for dependent action scams

On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 06:20, Ed Murphy wrote: > ais523 wrote: > >> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 09:49 +0100, ais523 wrote: >>> For each public contract (see the list at >>> ), I >>> intend, without objection; I intend, without member objectio

DIS: Re: BUS: Abject failure

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 22:25, Elliott Hird wrote: > I opposite-of-support to all attempts by ais523 to modify contracts. > > I leave all public contracts that I may. > Contracts you are able to leave: The People's Bank of Agora Contracts you are unable to leave: (2008-11-22 ehird) (as best I can

DIS: o...@?

Am I party to the Points Party? The Notary wiki says no, but I believe I joined it in this message: http://www.mail-archive.com/agora-busin...@agoranomic.org/msg13437.html

DIS: Re: BUS: Intent to ditch the Points Party

On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 16:57, ais523 wrote: > On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 07:04 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: >> I retract my proposal "Kill it with fire". >> >> I submit the following proposal, and intend (without objection) to >> make it distributable: >> >> Proposal:  Kill it with fire >> (AI = 2, II = 0,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Insulator Election

On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > While I appreciate the extortion, could you be so kind as to make it so that > someone else No Confidencing the IADoP election doesn't kill my shot at > Insulator? Thanks. I doubt my one vote is going to me that important. And if BobTHJ wants to