On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 10:46, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 10:44 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 14:13, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> > I play Penalty Box to audit Murphy. >> > >> Fails as far as I can tell. With Notice is defined in the rules and >> requires a minimum of 4 days. >> > I gave arguments about this afterwards. With Notice is /not/ defined in > the rules, it simply triggers the dependent action rule (which cares > about if a rule contains the words or not, without giving them a > meaning). The argument is as to whether a rule stating something that > looks vaguely like a dependent action therefore loses its > natural-language meaning. > Yes, sorry. I didn't read your arguments until after I sent the message.
BobTHJ
