Proto-judgement (and top-post): TRUE, because unless you believe a
contract is a forum, you have no reason to attempt to flip its
Publicity to Public; any attempt to do so is almost certainly an
attempt to flip its Disclosure to Public. I'm withholding this
judgement because it may be that even if
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> Hmm, there's two possible ways an incorrect election notice can be VALID.
>> (1) It can be VALID in initiating an election, even though it's incorrect
>> in some specified detail; but the platonic "
G. wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Appeal 2574a
>>
>> Panelist: G.
>> Decision: OVERRULE/FALSE
>>
>> Panelist: Quazie
>> Decision:
Yally wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 10:19 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> On 6369, c-walker endorsed the contestmaster who awarded the most
>>> points in May. By my count, the totals by contest were
>>>
>>> xy contest
>>>
>>>29 36
G. wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Judge allispaul's Arguments:
>> Importantly, a valid Notice of Violation has the
>> effects it describes. CFJ 2481 and the associated cases are of note
>> here: though the NoV's in question were certainly incorrect, they were
>> valid and had t
> I like this idea, but I'm not so sure that it's what the Anarchist's
> duties embody.
>
Just because we don't like government doesn't mean we can't be a
vector for positive change!
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Hmm, there's two possible ways an incorrect election notice can be VALID.
> (1) It can be VALID in initiating an election, even though it's incorrect
> in some specified detail; but the platonic "correct" information governed in
> the rules is w
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Paul VanKoughnett wrote:
> Proposal: Medieval Anarchy (AI=1, II=0)
> {
> WHEREAS Agora has graced the world of Nomic with its presence for
> nearly 16 years (1600 in Nomic years), and
>
> WHEREAS such a long-running Nomic SHOULD leave behind medieval
> trappings, an
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 10:19 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> On 6369, c-walker endorsed the contestmaster who awarded the most
>>> points in May. By my count, the totals by contest were
>>>
>>
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Judge allispaul's Arguments:
>> Importantly, a valid Notice of Violation has the
>> effects it describes. CFJ 2481 and the associated cases are of note
>> here: though the NoV's in question were certai
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 10:19 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> On 6369, c-walker endorsed the contestmaster who awarded the most
>> points in May. By my count, the totals by contest were
>>
>> x y contest
>>
>> 29 36 3-Scroll Rodney
>> 1
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Appeal 2574a
>
> Panelist: G.
> Decision: OVERRULE/FALSE
>
> Panelist: Quazie
> Decision:
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Judge allispaul's Arguments:
> Importantly, a valid Notice of Violation has the
> effects it describes. CFJ 2481 and the associated cases are of note
> here: though the NoV's in question were certainly incorrect, they were
> valid and had the effect of crea
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, comex wrote:
> On Jun 24, 2009, at 6:20 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> Oh ps., if this is part of another method for sticking this through, there's
>> an old precedent that says "reasonable time" for response when unspecified
>> is
>> a minimum of 4 days (precedent said that, giv
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 24, 2009, at 6:20 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Oh ps., if this is part of another method for sticking this through,
there's
an old precedent that says "reasonable time" for response when
unspecified is
a minimum of 4 days (precedent said that, given Agoran culture and
ais523 wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 08:29 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> G. wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> 6372 D 1 2.0 G. Transition Team
AGAINST
>>> I'm a little puzzled by opposition to this (not just on your part, other
>>> voters too...) is
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, comex wrote:
> [I assume this counts as reasonably public review for the Rule Change
> of creating that rule, even if it is performed other than through the
> proposal actually passing.]
Oh ps., if this is part of another method for sticking this through, there's
an old prec
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, comex wrote:
> I submit the following proposal, entitled "R101 Safety Net" (AI=3):
> {
> Enact a new Power=3 Rule reading:
>
> comex CAN cause this rule to amend itself by announcement, as
> long as e published the amendment for public review at least 24
> hours
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 19:36 +0100, C-walker wrote:
> > Really? I thought recordkeepors could create assets that they
> > recordkeep, but they got to the L&FD because the recordkeepor doesn't
> > have an ability to give them owners.
>
> I don't think the assets rule specifies whose possession the a
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:36, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 10:43 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> C-walker wrote:
>> > I agree to the following contract. Being its only party, I flip its
>> > Publicity to Public.
>> >
>> > I intend, without 3 objections, to flip its contestmaster to C-walke
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 01:34 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> >>> Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> Your voting limit is 8.
> >>> Incorrect.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Rule .
> > Ru
> I object (in both Agora and B). Points inflation is bad enough, and I
> think part of the reason is that people haven't been objecting to new
> contests that haven't been widely discussed aggressively enough.
>
> --
> ais523
>
> ___
> spoon-business mai
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 22:08 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > coppro wrote:
> >> Warrigal wrote:
> >>> ...that I should have two different jobs thrust upon me at the same
> >>> time as I'm installed as Conductor. I resign as Conductor, thereby
> >>> fulfilling th
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 2:36 PM,
C-walker wrote:
> I don't think the assets rule specifies whose possession the assets
> are created in, so I assumed that that was up to the recordkeepor.
CFJ 1850
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 16:39 +0100, C-walker wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:24 AM,
>> > C-walker wrote:
>> >> With the consent of myself, I amend "The Grid" by replacing
>> >
>> > P
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 10:43 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
> C-walker wrote:
> > I agree to the following contract. Being its only party, I flip its
> > Publicity to Public.
> >
> > I intend, without 3 objections, to flip its contestmaster to C-walker in B.
> >
> > I intend, without 3 objections, to fli
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 16:39 +0100, C-walker wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:24 AM,
> > C-walker wrote:
> >> With the consent of myself, I amend "The Grid" by replacing
> >
> > Probably fails since it's not a contract; a non-pledge contr
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 08:29 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> G. wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> >>> 6372 D 1 2.0 G. Transition Team
> >> AGAINST
> >
> > I'm a little puzzled by opposition to this (not just on your part, other
> > voters too...) is there a bug
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 12:12 +0100, C-walker wrote:
> When a player (the attorney) acts on behalf of another player to
> perform an action, that action is performed as if the attorney is the
> player e is acting on behalf of.
Hypothetical contract: {{Anyone but ais523 can leave this contract.}}
Hyp
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 2:34 AM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> Psssht. What's the point of even having Rule ?
The prerogative is the only way to circumvent it; if you feel strongly
about the WEV not getting > 8 votes, propose powering up (Power
2.222 should do nicely), or spend notes to decreas
30 matches
Mail list logo
