Instant Gratification?
Leapt Before Lookt?
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Paul VanKoughnett wrote:
> > I retract my proposal "Very little to no lurk time."
> >
> > Please respond if you believe you deserve the Patent Title of Not A
> > Lurker. I'll resubmit when I have a mor
Paul VanKoughnett wrote:
> I retract my proposal "Very little to no lurk time."
>
> Please respond if you believe you deserve the Patent Title of Not A
> Lurker. I'll resubmit when I have a more complete list.
I think the patent title deserves a better name. Something creative.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Paul VanKoughnett wrote:
> I retract my proposal "Very little to no lurk time."
>
> Please respond if you believe you deserve the Patent Title of Not A Lurker.
> I'll resubmit when I have a more complete list.
Who has the longest lurk time? I have approx 3-4 years
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > I think that's in the FAQ, although maybe that's just about R104.
> > Original ruleset defined games as ending and beginning the next one
> > when someone won, and someone indeed did in the first yea
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Craig Daniel wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>> Oh hey you're that Craig? I remember your CFJs fondly. -G.
>>
>
> Huh. I don't remember them at all. But yes, I'm the same Craig.
>
> ...how bad were they?
Not bad at all. Actually it's the INS
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
>>> I CFJ on the following statement: The first game of Agora lasted 100 years.
>>
>> I think that's in the FAQ, although maybe that's just about R104
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I think that's in the FAQ, although maybe that's just about R104.
> Original ruleset defined games as ending and beginning the next one
> when someone won, and someone indeed did in the first year or so.
On a related note, here's a question: how many here
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
>> I CFJ on the following statement: The first game of Agora lasted 100 years.
>
> I think that's in the FAQ, although maybe that's just about R104.
> Original ruleset defined games as ending and b
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
> I CFJ on the following statement: The first game of Agora lasted 100 years.
I think that's in the FAQ, although maybe that's just about R104.
Original ruleset defined games as ending and beginning the next one
when someone won, and someone indeed did
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Kerim Aydin
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Michael Norrish wrote:
> >> Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> >>> But Michael created the game. You at least heard of agora before
> you
> >>> created it. E
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> Oh hey you're that Craig? I remember your CFJs fondly. -G.
>
Huh. I don't remember them at all. But yes, I'm the same Craig.
...how bad were they?
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
> teucer wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Aaron Goldfein
>> wrote:
>>> You never registered, at least not recently.
>>
>> I believed I registered on January 3, and was immediately NOV'd for
>
> IIRC you are also the "Craig" that was registered fro
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Michael Norrish wrote:
>> Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>>> But Michael created the game. You at least heard of agora before you
>>> created it. E created it.
>>
>>> E had probably played/watched a lot more nomic than I
Paul VanKoughnett wrote:
> I retract my proposal "Very little to no lurk time."
>
> Please respond if you believe you deserve the Patent Title of Not A
> Lurker. I'll resubmit when I have a more complete list.
I do I signed up, immediately registered, and jumped right in.
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Craig Daniel wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Craig Daniel wrote:
(11:16:39 PM) craigbdaniel: Does the word "Agora" mean anything not
teucer wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
>> You never registered, at least not recently.
>
> I believed I registered on January 3, and was immediately NOV'd for
IIRC you are also the "Craig" that was registered from 25 Apr 02
to 9 Mar 03.
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Michael Norrish wrote:
> Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>> But Michael created the game. You at least heard of agora before you
>> created it. E created it.
>
>> E had probably played/watched a lot more nomic than I had.
>
> I'd read Steve Gardner's Nomic World reports, and th
teucer wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Craig Daniel wrote:
>> I call a CFJ on the statement: "Luke Lockhart is a player."
>>
>
> Having restored my playerhood, I do so again, probably efficaciously this
> time.
It was effective the first time. You can retract the second case.
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
But Michael created the game. You at least heard of agora before you
created it. E created it.
E had probably played/watched a lot more nomic than I had.
I'd read Steve Gardner's Nomic World reports, and that was it. I think
this was through a mailing list t
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Craig Daniel wrote:
>> > (11:16:39 PM) craigbdaniel: Does the word "Agora" mean anything not
>> > directly related to either Greece or a
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Craig Daniel wrote:
> > (11:16:39 PM) craigbdaniel: Does the word "Agora" mean anything not
> > directly related to either Greece or agoraphobia to you?
>
> Evidence.
>
> Kyle Marek-Spartz - KDØGTK
I do
Craig Daniel wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Craig Daniel wrote:
>> I call a CFJ on the statement: "Luke Lockhart is a player."
>>
>
> Having restored my playerhood, I do so again, probably efficaciously this
> time.
I'd retract the second one; you don't need to be a player to initiate
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Craig Daniel wrote:
> (11:16:39 PM) craigbdaniel: Does the word "Agora" mean anything not
> directly related to either Greece or agoraphobia to you?
Evidence.
Kyle Marek-Spartz - KDØGTK
Craig Daniel wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Craig Daniel wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Aaron Goldfein
>>> wrote:
You're not a player.
>>> I'm not?
>>>
>>> Shit, when did I get deregistered?
>> You never
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Craig Daniel wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Aaron Goldfein
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > You're not a player.
>>>
>>> I'm not
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Craig Daniel wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Aaron Goldfein
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > You're not a player.
>>
>> I'm not?
>>
>> Shit, when did I get deregistered?
>
> You never registered, at le
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Craig Daniel wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Aaron Goldfein
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > You're not a player.
>>
>> I'm not?
>>
>> Shit, when did I get deregistered?
>
> You never registered, at le
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Paul VanKoughnett wrote:
>>> Award the Patent Title of Not A Lurker to Yally.
>
> Doesn't get my vote unless you poll whom amongst us also deserves this.
> -G.
Agreed.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Paul VanKoughnett wrote:
>> Award the Patent Title of Not A Lurker to Yally.
Doesn't get my vote unless you poll whom amongst us also deserves this.
-G.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
You at least heard of Agora before you joined it.
>
> I pledge to transfer a prop from myself to the first person who, while not a
> player and not barred from registering (either due to recent
> deregistration or non-personship), attem
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Kerim Aydin
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> >>> Of course, in terms of "shortest lurk time", Michael will always win.
> >>> -G.
> >>
> >> Not really. I received a grand total
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Craig Daniel wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
> >
> > You're not a player.
>
> I'm not?
>
> Shit, when did I get deregistered?
>
You never registered, at least not recently.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>
> You're not a player.
I'm not?
Shit, when did I get deregistered?
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Craig Daniel wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Kerim Aydin
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Luke Lockhart >wrote:
> >>> I have no idea what is going on here but wish to join you.
> >>>
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
> Irresistable. I transfer a prop from G. to Murphy (sorry, nothing
> personal).
> >>>
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> I transfer a prop from Murphy to coppro because this whole line of prop
> transfering is inane.
Actually, it's the whole purpose of Props = harmless way to vent ire.
Then again your transfer also fulfilled said purpose. -G.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Craig Daniel wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz
> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Aaron Goldfein <
> aarongoldf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
Irresistable. I transfer a prop from G. to Murphy (sorry, nothing
personal).
>>> If I have not already done so this week, I transfer a from cop
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
>>> Irresistable. I transfer a prop from G. to Murphy (sorry, nothing personal).
>> If I have not already done so this week, I transfer a from coppro to
>> ehird because ditto. -G.
>
> I attempt
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>>> Of course, in terms of "shortest lurk time", Michael will always win.
>>> -G.
>>
>> Not really. I received a grand total of 0 game messages before registering.
>
> I assume you were subscribed for
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Luke Lockhart wrote:
>> I have no idea what is going on here but wish to join you.
>>
> Welcome to Agora. Is there any nickname you would like to use?
Er, not knowing what one is wishing and not using the term for
becom
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>> Of course, in terms of "shortest lurk time", Michael will always win.
>> -G.
>
> Not really. I received a grand total of 0 game messages before registering.
I assume you were subscribed for a positive finite time?
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
>
> Can non-players get crim CFJs? What if players committed crimes prior
> to eir registration? If "you" were a second-class person, would its
> parties be liable?
If it were, then Luke's message would have been ambiguous.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Craig Daniel wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Aaron Goldfein
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Luke Lockhart
>>> wrote:
I have no idea what is going on here but wish
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Luke Lockhart
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have no idea what is going on here but wish to join you.
>>
>> Welcome to Agora. Is there any nickname you w
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Luke Lockhart
> wrote:
>>
>> I have no idea what is going on here but wish to join you.
>
> Welcome to Agora. Is there any nickname you would like to use?
>
> -Yally
>
I was assuming "You".
Kyle Marek-Spa
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Luke Lockhart wrote:
> I have no idea what is going on here but wish to join you.
>
Welcome to Agora. Is there any nickname you would like to use?
-Yally
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> Trivial typo != ambiguity
Eir CFJ does not check for ambiguities. E is just pointing it out.
Kyle Marek-Spartz - KDØGTK
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>
>> Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>> > I initiate an election to decide the holder of the CotC office. The
>> > eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector is the IADoP,
>> > and
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
> >>>You at least heard of Agora before you joined it.
>
> I pledge to transfer a prop from myself to the first person who, while not
> a
> player and not barred from registering (either due to recent
> deregistration or non-personship), at
Trivial typo != ambiguity
On 2009-06-04, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>
>> Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>> > I initiate an election to decide the holder of the CotC office. The
>> > eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector is the IADoP,
>> >
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz
> wrote:
> You at least heard of Agora before you joined it.
> >
> > I pledge to transfer a prop from myself to the first person who, while
> not a
> > player and not barred from re
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
You at least heard of Agora before you joined it.
>
> I pledge to transfer a prop from myself to the first person who, while not a
> player and not barred from registering (either due to recent
> deregistration or non-personship), attem
Yally wrote:
> I initiate an election to decide the holder of the CotC office. The
> eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector is the IADoP,
> and the options are Murphy (incumbent), You May Call Me Big Fucking
> Edward, and PRESENT.
I vote for Me.
comex wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Benjamin Caplan
> wrote:
>> To reduce long-term ambiguity, I deposit all my crops in the IBA in the
>> order that maximizes the net amount of zm thereby gained.
>
>
> If this is correct:
>
> Player 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X
Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 16:19, Benjamin
> Caplan wrote:
>> comex wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:58 PM, comex wrote:
I initiate a Motion to Amend, specifying the following amendment (in
diff format). ?The eligible voters are the parties to the IBA, the
option
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:58 PM, comex wrote:
> YOU MAY CALL ME BIG FUCKING EDWARD
Does that mean comex is now BIG FUCKING EDWARD?
--
Taral
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 16:19, Benjamin
Caplan wrote:
> comex wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:58 PM, comex wrote:
>>> I initiate a Motion to Amend, specifying the following amendment (in
>>> diff format). �The eligible voters are the parties to the IBA, the
>>> options are FOR, AGAINST, and PRES
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Elliott Hird <
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 2009/6/4 Aaron Goldfein :
> > I initiate an election to decide the holder of the CotC office. The
> eligible
> > voters are the active players, the vote collector is the IADoP, and the
> > options are Murphy (
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Quazie wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Aaron Goldfein
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Kerim Aydin
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Quazie wrote:
>> >> > On
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Quazie wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Kerim Aydin
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Quazie wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Kerim Aydin
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> On Wed,
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Quazie wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Kerim Aydin
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
>> >>> Get off my lawn! Even I lurked
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Quazie wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Kerim Aydin
> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
> >>> Get off my lawn! Even I lurked for a month or two :P
> >>
> >> I didn't. Registered within an hou
Pavitra wrote:
> I'm assuming the last word of paragraph 3 should have been "Black."
Yes, copy+paste error.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Benjamin Caplan
wrote:
> To reduce long-term ambiguity, I deposit all my crops in the IBA in the
> order that maximizes the net amount of zm thereby gained.
If this is correct:
Player 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X WRV
Pavitra1 7 0
Ed Murphy wrote:
> comex wrote:
>
>> Actions in Agora are generally ordered; unordered actions are accepted
>> only when they cause no ambiguity because the order is unimportant to
>> the rules. Assets are rule-defined entities and allowing the unordered
>> transfers (before the amendment I
comex wrote:
> Actions in Agora are generally ordered; unordered actions are accepted
> only when they cause no ambiguity because the order is unimportant to
> the rules. Assets are rule-defined entities and allowing the unordered
> transfers (before the amendment I proposed, which specifies
Actions in Agora are generally ordered; unordered actions are accepted
only when they cause no ambiguity because the order is unimportant to
the rules. Assets are rule-defined entities and allowing the unordered
transfers (before the amendment I proposed, which specifies a default
order, ta
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 13:51, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> Arguments: Pavitra didn't say "I transfer all my crops to the IBA",
>> instead e attempted to perform an action defined by the IBA contract
>> (deposit) which if successful would result in t
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> Arguments: Pavitra didn't say "I transfer all my crops to the IBA",
> instead e attempted to perform an action defined by the IBA contract
> (deposit) which if successful would result in the transfer of assets
> from Pavitra to the bank.
"A per
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Quazie wrote:
>>> I had a printout copy of the ruleset the first time i started agora.
>> I ran out of paper.
>
> Double sided.
In parentheses. In quotation
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 13:30, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Benjamin Caplan
> wrote:
>> I join the IBA, deposit all my crops in it, and request subsidy.
>
> I CFJ on: "Pavitra owns at least 1 crop."
>
> Evidence: comex claims the deposit fails because e didn't specify an
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Quazie wrote:
>> I had a printout copy of the ruleset the first time i started agora.
> I ran out of paper.
Double sided.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Quazie wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:35, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
> >>> Get off my lawn! Even I lurked for a month or two :P
> >>
> >> I didn't. Registered wit
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:35, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
>>> Get off my lawn! Even I lurked for a month or two :P
>>
>> I didn't. Registered within an hour of finding this place. Well, I
>> attempted to an
Directed at Yally.
On 2009-06-03, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Sgeo wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Elliott Hird
>> wrote:
>>> Get off my lawn! Even I lurked for a month or two :P
>
> I'm not antilurk. I'm merely a hands on learner.
>
> Kyle Marek-Spart
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:35, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
>> Get off my lawn! Even I lurked for a month or two :P
>
> I didn't. Registered within an hour of finding this place. Well, I
> attempted to and caused a CFJ, *then* registered. And no, you can't
> have
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Quazie wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
>>> Get off my lawn! Even I lurked for a month or two :P
>>
>> I didn't. Registered within an hour of finding this place. Well, I
>> attempted to and caused a CFJ, *
comex wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Benjamin Caplan
> wrote:
>> All this is far more complicated than it's worth.
>> {
>> Amend rule 1742 (Contracts) by appending the paragraph:
>> � � �A person CAN on behalf of another as authorized by a public
>> � � �contract to which the person on
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
>> Get off my lawn! Even I lurked for a month or two :P
>
> I didn't. Registered within an hour of finding this place. Well, I
> attempted to and caused a CFJ, *then* registered. And no, you can't
> h
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
> Get off my lawn! Even I lurked for a month or two :P
I didn't. Registered within an hour of finding this place. Well, I
attempted to and caused a CFJ, *then* registered. And no, you can't
have your frisbee back. -G.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Sgeo wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Elliott Hird
> wrote:
>> Get off my lawn! Even I lurked for a month or two :P
I'm not antilurk. I'm merely a hands on learner.
Kyle Marek-Spartz - KDØGTK
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> Get off my lawn! Even I lurked for a month or two :P
I've lurked since 2005... kind of. I was interested in Agora in 2005,
but did not participate, nor did I ask to be a watcher. I was
subscribed to a-d, but nothing else. I eventually got bore
He had it for B.
On 2009-06-03, Ed Murphy wrote:
> c-walker wrote:
>
>> No, you're right. I thought I had joined. I join the IBA.
>>
>> --
>> C-walker, who clearly intends this message to be public.
>
> NttPF (and there's Agoran precedent that your .sig doesn't work,
> as one cannot rely on every
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> c-walker wrote:
>
>> No, you're right. I thought I had joined. I join the IBA.
>>
>> --
>> C-walker, who clearly intends this message to be public.
>
> NttPF (and there's Agoran precedent that your .sig doesn't work,
> as one cannot rely on every
c-walker wrote:
> No, you're right. I thought I had joined. I join the IBA.
>
> --
> C-walker, who clearly intends this message to be public.
NttPF (and there's Agoran precedent that your .sig doesn't work,
as one cannot rely on everyone being subscribed to a-d)
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:40 PM, comex wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:28 PM, comex wrote:
> >> I initiate a Motion to Amend, specifying the following amendment (in
> >> diff format). The eligible voters are the parties to the IBA,
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:28 PM, comex wrote:
>> I initiate a Motion to Amend, specifying the following amendment (in
>> diff format). The eligible voters are the parties to the IBA, the
>> options are FOR, AGAINST, and PRESENT, and I am th
Get off my lawn! Even I lurked for a month or two :P
On 2009-06-03, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Paul VanKoughnett
> wrote:
>
>> Clearly I'm a player. I registered in the seventh sentence of my first
>> e-mail.
>>
>> And, Yally, I've been lurking at least a year. Is
Sucks
The iPhone
But
I'm sorry
On 2009-06-03, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> Paul VanKoughnett wrote:
>> What about private contracts?
>
> It was suggested recently, and I think I agree, that private
> act-on-behalf authorization is generally a Bad Thing because it makes it
> difficult or impossible to
As Wooble said, the PBA is bootstrapped and simpler than the IBA to boot - but
Step 1. Gain active economy.
On 2009-06-03, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> I join the IBA, deposit all my crops in it, and request subsidy.
>
> Pavitra
>
Someone attempts to inactivate you.
(A) Start participating
(B) Let it happen
(C) Just object without justification for eternity, inflating quorum.
> C
On 2009-06-03, Christian Julius wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:25 AM, comex wrote:
>>
>> I intend, without objection, to make Siege inactive.
2009/6/3 Sean Hunt :
> Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>> 2009/6/3 Aaron Goldfein :
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Aaron Goldfein
>>> wrote:
I award myself a Cyan Ribbon (I deputized for the IADoP a long time ago
but never awarded myself a ribbon).
>>> Also, I award myself a Green Ribbon
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> 2009/6/3 Aaron Goldfein :
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Aaron Goldfein
>> wrote:
>>> I award myself a Cyan Ribbon (I deputized for the IADoP a long time ago
>>> but never awarded myself a ribbon).
>> Also, I award myself a Green Ribbon for my services as IADoP duri
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:53 AM, Benjamin Caplan
wrote:
> The Assessor's report contains a list of all pending intents to
> perform dependent actions.
Doesn't really work; just post your sneaky intent immediately after
the Assessor's report is published and you can resolve it before a ne
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:18 PM, comex wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Benjamin Caplan
> wrote:
> > All this is far more complicated than it's worth.
> > {
> > Amend rule 1742 (Contracts) by appending the paragraph:
> > A person CAN on behalf of another as authorized by a public
>
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Benjamin Caplan
wrote:
> All this is far more complicated than it's worth.
> {
> Amend rule 1742 (Contracts) by appending the paragraph:
> A person CAN on behalf of another as authorized by a public
> contract to which the person on whose behalf e is acti
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Benjamin Caplan
wrote:
> I join the IBA, deposit all my crops in it, and request subsidy.
Sorry, but this fails as the order is unspecified.
2009/6/3 Geoffrey Spear :
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Christian Julius wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:25 AM, comex wrote:
>>>
>>> I intend, without objection, to make Siege inactive.
>>
>> I object to making Siege inactive.
>
> Can we inactivate by proposal?
I don't see why not.
--
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Christian Julius wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:25 AM, comex wrote:
>>
>> I intend, without objection, to make Siege inactive.
>
> I object to making Siege inactive.
Can we inactivate by proposal?
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
