On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz <zeckal...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> >>> Of course, in terms of "shortest lurk time", Michael will always win.
> >>> -G.
> >>
> >> Not really. I received a grand total of 0 game messages before
> registering.
> >
> > I assume you were subscribed for a positive finite time?
>
> Lurk time could be defined in number of messages viewed whilst
> inactive and/or a non-player.
>
> or
>
> Lurk time could be defined as a positive finite duration of time where
> said lurker is inactive and/or a non-player.
>
> Depending on which it is, *you are both right.
>
> *NOT Luke Lockhart.
>
> Kyle Marek-Spartz - KDØGTK
>
Proposal: Very little or no lurk time (II=1, AI=1)
{
Amend rule 1922, Defined Regular Patent Titles, by adding a new bullet
reading:
"(i) Not A Lurker, awarded to those individuals who attempted to emulate
First Speaker Michael Norrish by registering as soon as possible after
hearing about Agora."
Award the Patent Title of Not A Lurker to Yally.
}
I intend, with 3 support, to make this proposal Distributable.
