On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:18 PM, comex <com...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Benjamin Caplan
> <celestialcognit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > All this is far more complicated than it's worth.
> > {
> > Amend rule 1742 (Contracts) by appending the paragraph:
> > A person CAN on behalf of another as authorized by a public
> > contract to which the person on whose behalf e is acting is a
> > party.
> > }
>
> change 'as' to 'if and only if' and I'm sold.
>
"if and only if *so* authorized," no?
