On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Wed, 6 May 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> On Wed, 6 May 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>>
Each of the following CFJs are Interest Index 2:
I CFJ {It is POSSIBLE to enact a power-4 rule reading in part {This rule
t
On Wed, 6 May 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Wed, 6 May 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>
>>> Each of the following CFJs are Interest Index 2:
>>> I CFJ {It is POSSIBLE to enact a power-4 rule reading in part {This rule
>>> takes precedence over all other rules.}}
>> [etc]
>>
>> Gratuit
On 2009-05-06, Sgeo wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 21:28 -0400, Sgeo wrote:
>>> Making it so that only one new person a day can register might slow
>>> down invasions. Perhaps making it so that only 2 people can register
>>> in any given block
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Sean Hunt wrote:
> > Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> >> I initiate an Agoran decision to choose the holder of the Herald
> >> office. The eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector
> >> is the IADoP, and the candidates are Yally and root.
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Wed, 6 May 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>> I initiate an Agoran decision to choose the holder of the CotC office.
>> The eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector is the
>> IADoP, and the candidates are Arnold Bros (est. 1905), Murphy, and
>> Wooble.
>
> I v
Yally wrote:
> I initiate an Agoran decision to choose the holder of the Tailor
> office. The eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector
> is the IADoP, and the candidates are coppro and Yally.
I endorse Wooble.
ais523 wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 00:10 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>> 2009/5/7 comex :
>>> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Sgeo wrote:
Does that rule have a title, because it looks like the title you gave
is for the proposal.
Also, I think this is just a phase. I've been fan
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 16:14, comex wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
Also, I think this is just a phase. I've been fantasizing about a war
between Agora and the Aerican Empire for some reason.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, they claim to be a pacifist empire.
>>
2009/5/7 Alex Smith :
> On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 00:10 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>> 2009/5/7 comex :
>> > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Sgeo wrote:
>> >> Does that rule have a title, because it looks like the title you gave
>> >> is for the proposal.
>> >> Also, I think this is just a phase. I'
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 00:10 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> 2009/5/7 comex :
> > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Sgeo wrote:
> >> Does that rule have a title, because it looks like the title you gave
> >> is for the proposal.
> >> Also, I think this is just a phase. I've been fantasizing about a w
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
>>> Also, I think this is just a phase. I've been fantasizing about a war
>>> between Agora and the Aerican Empire for some reason.
>>
>> Unfortunately, they claim to be a pacifist empire.
>>
> What if Agora attacked them?
How?
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 17:55 -0400, Sgeo wrote:
> Does that rule have a title, because it looks like the title you gave
> is for the proposal.
> Also, I think this is just a phase. I've been fantasizing about a war
> between Agora and the Aerican Empire for some reason.
The title's indeed just for
2009/5/7 comex :
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Sgeo wrote:
>> Does that rule have a title, because it looks like the title you gave
>> is for the proposal.
>> Also, I think this is just a phase. I've been fantasizing about a war
>> between Agora and the Aerican Empire for some reason.
>
> Unfo
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Sgeo wrote:
> Does that rule have a title, because it looks like the title you gave
> is for the proposal.
> Also, I think this is just a phase. I've been fantasizing about a war
> between Agora and the Aerican Empire for some reason.
Unfortunately, they claim to b
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 21:28 -0400, Sgeo wrote:
>> Making it so that only one new person a day can register might slow
>> down invasions. Perhaps making it so that only 2 people can register
>> in any given block of two consecutive days might also
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:42 PM, comex wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
> > I initiate an Agoran decision to choose the holder of the CotC office.
> > The eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector is the
> > IADoP, and the candidates are Arnold Bro
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Quazie wrote:
>> Hmm... I CFJ on the following sentence. If a member of an entity's basis
>> nominates that entity for an election, then that entity has been
>> self-nominated.
>>
>
> Good call, never though of that.
Gratuitous: Most partnerships don't allow their
Yally wrote:
> I don't quite get what you're trying to say here.
"Wow, that really is a lot of elections"?
On Wed, 6 May 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 13:54 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> Actually what the heck, I support this intent, requesting REMAND.
>> If you all want a thesis on the subject (of which I'm not certain
>> of the outcome) I'm happy to write a thesis on the subject and
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 13:54 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Actually what the heck, I support this intent, requesting REMAND.
> If you all want a thesis on the subject (of which I'm not certain
> of the outcome) I'm happy to write a thesis on the subject and
> take all these myriad possibilities into a
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Quazie wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Quazie wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 2:25 PM, comex wrote:
>> >> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Aaron Goldfein
>> >> wrote:
>> >>> IADoP's Offic
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I was curious to quantify the seeming recent upswing of elections, and
> compiled this list from a-o messages with "election" in the subject,
> plus the latest IADoP's report:
>
> Jan 7 Accountor Wooble
> Jan 7 Anarchist Woobl
On Wed, 6 May 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> Oh ffs were you just waiting for a completely boring one for me.
>>
>> Judgement
>>
>> By CFJ1945 UNDETERMINED (i.e. false except that "under certain
>> circumstances, with very clear aggravating cir
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 21:31 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>> Shouldn't that be Officor for homeland Security or something?
>
> No, because an Officer isn't someone who offices.
Schroedingor?
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 15:19 -0400, comex wrote:
>> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Rodlen wrote:
>> > I CfJ on the following statement:
>>
>> CFJ :p
>
> Hey, I often write it with a lowercase f. I agree that the capital is
> more common, though.
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Oh ffs were you just waiting for a completely boring one for me.
>
> Judgement
>
> By CFJ1945 UNDETERMINED (i.e. false except that "under certain
> circumstances, with very clear aggravating circumstances, it is
> just about possible to breach r
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 21:31 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> Shouldn't that be Officor for homeland Security or something?
No, because an Officer isn't someone who offices.
--
ais523
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 15:19 -0400, comex wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Rodlen wrote:
> > I CfJ on the following statement:
>
> CFJ :p
Hey, I often write it with a lowercase f. I agree that the capital is
more common, though.
--
ais523
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 11:45 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> The AFO buys a Digit Ranch.
Err, how, given that it isn't a player? It has nothing to pay with.
--
ais523
2009/5/6 Alex Smith :
> On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 21:28 -0400, Sgeo wrote:
>> Making it so that only one new person a day can register might slow
>> down invasions. Perhaps making it so that only 2 people can register
>> in any given block of two consecutive days might also help in the case
>> that two
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Rodlen wrote:
> I CfJ on the following statement:
CFJ :p
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> I pledge to spend a major chord to increase the caste of any player
> who transfers me one of the following for such explicit purpose, as
> soon as possible after such a transfer occurs:
>
> * five X crops
> * eight crops of any other variety or
Okay, the second attempt failed because clause 12 restricts each
Farmer to one purchase a week, and the third failed because the
AFO has no points.
Blah. Must remember to buy a Digit Ranch next week.
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Rodlen wrote:
> I CfJ on the following statement:
>
> "Not treating Agora right good forever violates rule 101."
See CFJ 1945.
-root
I was curious to quantify the seeming recent upswing of elections, and
compiled this list from a-o messages with "election" in the subject,
plus the latest IADoP's report:
Jan 7 Accountor Wooble
Jan 7 Anarchist Wooble
Jan 12-20 Anarchist Bayes 3, Goethe 2, Wooble 1
J
2009/5/6 Ed Murphy :
> I don't get it.
I do. Or at least, I made up my own joke about it that might
be funny.
On Wed, 6 May 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Rodlen wrote:
>
>> What I'm doing is getting confused by the equity case rules (I was not
>> expecting this case...). This was an attempt to make a judgment,
>> leaving it to the parties involved to agree to it...
>
> An ineffective attempt. The parties hav
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
> I believe my millings happened even if the subsequent harvesting
> failed, but to make things clear:
> If I have no 2 crops, I mill 3/7=2
> If I have no 4 crops, I mill 7-3=4
> (or maybe this was a corrected report of the crop holdings of t
2009/5/6 Ed Murphy :
> I don't get it.
I'm not surprised.
> Unless I've missed something, this covers the following proposals
> (not counting those where you'd already voted your limit):
And some elections.
Arnold Bros (est. 1905) wrote:
> 2009/5/6 Sean Hunt :
>> No. It's a joke between us (possibly e doesn't get it either).
>
> I may get it if it's to do with my name.
I don't get it.
> In which case, let me stretch it even further: I endorse coppro on all
> Agoran Decisions I can.
Unless I've mi
Rodlen wrote:
> What I'm doing is getting confused by the equity case rules (I was not
> expecting this case...). This was an attempt to make a judgment,
> leaving it to the parties involved to agree to it...
An ineffective attempt. The parties have had plenty of time to have
their say; give th
On May 6, 2009, at 12:41 PM, Rodlen wrote:
Weakening the connection between Comex and the PNP should help the
PNP's reputation. With thanks to ais523, I would like to suggest
the following judgment:
Until May 28, 2009, it is ILLEGAL for Comex to join the PNP.
How does that sound to the p
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Sgeo wrote:
> Making it so that only one new person a day can register might slow
> down invasions. Perhaps making it so that only 2 people can register
> in any given block of two consecutive days might also help in the case
> that two people happen to try to regis
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Sgeo wrote:
> Making it so that only one new person a day can register might slow
> down invasions. Perhaps making it so that only 2 people can register
> in any given block of two consecutive days might also help in the case
> that two people happen to try to regis
c-walker wrote:
> I endorse Tiger.
NttPF
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> FYI, it appears I can click on anyone's nickname to edit their crop
> and ranch holdings.
I'm not sure if that's a bug or a feature but I guess I should fix it...
2009/5/6 Roger Hicks :
> FYI, it appears I can click on anyone's nickname to edit their crop
> and ranch holdings.
AAApedia
The AAA report anyone can edit
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 09:16, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 09:02, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>> I went through everyone's holdings from the last report and reapplied
>>> all of the transactions, and these are the current holdin
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 09:02, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> I went through everyone's holdings from the last report and reapplied
>> all of the transactions, and these are the current holdings.
>> Obviously my transition from plain text files to an
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 09:02, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I went through everyone's holdings from the last report and reapplied
> all of the transactions, and these are the current holdings.
> Obviously my transition from plain text files to an automated system
> failed horribly; my apologies.
>
Autom
I endorse Tiger.
C-walker
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
> > I initiate an Agoran decision to choose the holder of the Anarchist
> > office. The eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector
> > is t
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> Crop/WRV Holdings
> Player 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X WRV
>
> AFO 28 10 2 6 7 2 6 35 14 13 3 0
> ais523 12 6 5 1 4
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> The fact that this does nothing to actual lurkers is understood and
> intended; it's just a way to prune Agora of people messing with quorum
> more efficiently than the w/o objection method.
I think a 7 day voting period on which everyone has to
53 matches
Mail list logo