On Wed, 6 May 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Wed, 6 May 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>
>>> Each of the following CFJs are Interest Index 2:
>>> I CFJ {It is POSSIBLE to enact a power-4 rule reading in part {This rule
>>> takes precedence over all other rules.}}
>> [etc]
>>
>> Gratuitous:
>>
>> When talking about what is possible by changing the rules anything can
>> change. These should all be TRUE, as it is possible to remove the
>> blocking section of R1482 (removing it would not in itself change
>> precedence so it doesn't block its own removal) and then enact any of
>> these within the same proposal.
>>
>> -Goethe
>
> Gratuitous:
>
> The possibility or illegality of an action cannot take into
> consideration the ability to change the rules or else all such inquiries
> would be TRUE - it is referring just to the ability to do that precise
> action.
I agree with you unless the action in question involves changing a rule.
