On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 6 May 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> On Wed, 6 May 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>>
>>>> Each of the following CFJs are Interest Index 2:
>>>> I CFJ {It is POSSIBLE to enact a power-4 rule reading in part {This rule
>>>> takes precedence over all other rules.}}
>>> [etc]
>>>
>>> Gratuitous:
>>>
>>> When talking about what is possible by changing the rules anything can
>>> change. These should all be TRUE, as it is possible to remove the
>>> blocking section of R1482 (removing it would not in itself change
>>> precedence so it doesn't block its own removal) and then enact any of
>>> these within the same proposal.
>>>
>>> -Goethe
>>
>> Gratuitous:
>>
>> The possibility or illegality of an action cannot take into
>> consideration the ability to change the rules or else all such inquiries
>> would be TRUE - it is referring just to the ability to do that precise
>> action.
>
> I agree with you unless the action in question involves changing a rule.
>
But the action in question doesn't involve changing the rule that
would need to be changed.
