Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Fix a flaw in our anti-invasion plan

Any thoughts on testing any plans? Either for real, by telling /b/ about Agora, or simulation (let several players control 1,000 first-class players, and a way to guard against the fallout when the simulation ends).

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: May I please have another?

Taral wrote: > On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: >> And that's different from the set of standing/sitting players how? > > Because the set of standing/sitting players changes constantly. The > standing court is changed periodically, probably on the scale of > months. So it would

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: May I please have another?

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > And that's different from the set of standing/sitting players how? Because the set of standing/sitting players changes constantly. The standing court is changed periodically, probably on the scale of months. -- Taral "Please let me know if the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Scam Safety

coppro wrote: > Aaron Goldfein wrote: >> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: >>> Elliott Hird wrote: Bad Promotor! You're meant to make it hard for scammers... >>> It does! >>> >> how? > By preventing people from piling on top of an existing scam. This makes > it easier for the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Fix a flaw in our anti-invasion plan

Ed Murphy wrote: > coppro wrote: > >> Actually, I just realized that one of the voting-limit 0 methods (which >> basically involves the Grand Poobah pulling out a very illegal but very >> valid machine gun) doesn't rely on the Senate. > > Doesn't stop the invaders from democratizing the invasion

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Fix a flaw in our anti-invasion plan

coppro wrote: > Actually, I just realized that one of the voting-limit 0 methods (which > basically involves the Grand Poobah pulling out a very illegal but very > valid machine gun) doesn't rely on the Senate. Doesn't stop the invaders from democratizing the invasion proposal.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Fix a flaw in our anti-invasion plan

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > comex wrote: >> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: >>> Actually, I just realized that one of the voting-limit 0 methods (which >>> basically involves the Grand Poobah pulling out a very illegal but very >>> valid machine gun) does

DIS: Re: BUS: I'm baaack

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Benjamin Caplan wrote: > I come off hold. > > > All actions in this message are to be taken as maximally severable. > > > I have 428 Coins. > > I withdraw from the PBA a 1 crop and a 3 crop [for 193+185 = 378 Coins.] > > > Murphy has 4229 Coins. > > I act on behalf

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Scam Safety

Aaron Goldfein wrote: > On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: >> Elliott Hird wrote: >>> Bad Promotor! You're meant to make it hard for scammers... >> It does! >> > how? By preventing people from piling on top of an existing scam. This makes it easier for the original people to pull it

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Scam Safety

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > Elliott Hird wrote: >> Bad Promotor! You're meant to make it hard for scammers... > > It does! > how?

Re: DIS: Proto-Contract: Industrial Bank & Agora

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Benjamin Caplan wrote: > comex wrote: >>   Repeats:   (a nonnegative integer, or infinity; default 1) > [...] >> An Offer with zero Repeats is automatically destroyed. > As was pointed out on IRC, this won't ever happen. Try "When an Offer > with one Repeat is fill

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Fix a flaw in our anti-invasion plan

comex wrote: > On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: >> Actually, I just realized that one of the voting-limit 0 methods (which >> basically involves the Grand Poobah pulling out a very illegal but very >> valid machine gun) doesn't rely on the Senate. > > Surely this only works on or

DIS: Re: BUS: I'm baaack

Benjamin Caplan wrote: > [These estimates assume that the PNP's report on April 20 was correct, > and that the only changes to that state between then and the beginning > of this message were the automatic adjustments on April 27.] > > > Pavitra > I don't believe they were.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Fix a flaw in our anti-invasion plan

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > Actually, I just realized that one of the voting-limit 0 methods (which > basically involves the Grand Poobah pulling out a very illegal but very > valid machine gun) doesn't rely on the Senate. Surely this only works on ordinary proposals.

Re: DIS: Proto-Contract: Industrial Bank & Agora

comex wrote: > Repeats: (a nonnegative integer, or infinity; default 1) [...] > An Offer with zero Repeats is automatically destroyed. As was pointed out on IRC, this won't ever happen. Try "When an Offer with one Repeat is filled, instead of its 'Repeats' field being decreased, the Offer is de

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Fix a flaw in our anti-invasion plan

Ed Murphy wrote: > coppro wrote: > >> Benjamin Caplan wrote: >>> Aaron Goldfein wrote: On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > There are two separate methods by > which the Agoran Senate can recover Agora from an invasion by reducing > every invader's voting limit to 0

DIS: Re: BUS: Nomic relations

On May 1, 2009, at 6:18 PM, Alex Smith wrote: I intend, without objection, to flip the Recognition of Internomic II to Neutral. I intend, without objection, to flip the Recognition of Fresh Nomic to Neutral. (Note,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Fix a flaw in our anti-invasion plan

Ed Murphy wrote: > coppro wrote: > >> Benjamin Caplan wrote: >> There's another (scammy) means by which an invasion can be prevented >> from making changes, but it would result in an effective stalemate in Agora. > > What do you have in mind? Bear in mind that the invaders can deputise > for the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Fix a flaw in our anti-invasion plan

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Benjamin Caplan wrote: > Edna is a professor of law, and decides to teach a course on nomic. She > requires her students to register in Agora and submit a quota of > proposals each week. Alice is one of her TAs. The students tend strongly > to vote with Edna in hop

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Fix a flaw in our anti-invasion plan

coppro wrote: > Benjamin Caplan wrote: >> Aaron Goldfein wrote: >>> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: There are two separate methods by which the Agoran Senate can recover Agora from an invasion by reducing every invader's voting limit to 0. Once this is done, it's s

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Scam Safety

Elliott Hird wrote: > Bad Promotor! You're meant to make it hard for scammers... It does!

DIS: Re: BUS: Scam Safety

Bad Promotor! You're meant to make it hard for scammers... On 2009-05-02, Sean Hunt wrote: > I agree to the following: > > {{ > This is a pledge entitled Security Clearance. > > This pledge imposes no duties on anyone unless coppro is Promotor. If e > is not, e may amend this pledge by announceme

Re: DIS: Proto-Contract: Industrial Bank & Agora

Add auto rates and I'm sold. Sent from a sentient banana On 2009-05-02, comex wrote: > The PBA, RBoA, and both Vote Markets are dead, which has made the > economy a lot less interesting. This is a draft for a replacement, > which allows regular banking, trade offers, and vote selling. Rates >

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Who has gained points?

ais523 wrote: > On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 17:44 -0400, comex wrote: >> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn >> wrote: >>> Okay. I terminate the pledge I just made about giving points for >>> points (if I can). >> Points are also a fixed currency, so you can't transfer them. > > You can, b

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Fix a flaw in our anti-invasion plan

Benjamin Caplan wrote: > Aaron Goldfein wrote: >> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: >>> There are two separate methods by >>> which the Agoran Senate can recover Agora from an invasion by reducing >>> every invader's voting limit to 0. Once this is done, it's simple to >>> pass a pr

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Fix a flaw in our anti-invasion plan

Aaron Goldfein wrote: > On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: >> There are two separate methods by >> which the Agoran Senate can recover Agora from an invasion by reducing >> every invader's voting limit to 0. Once this is done, it's simple to >> pass a proposal exiling the invaders. >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Fix a flaw in our anti-invasion plan

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > Benjamin Caplan wrote: >> Elliott Hird wrote: >>> 2009/5/1 Alex Smith : {{{ Persons SHALL NOT join Agora for the primary purpose of invading or waging war against it, rather than participating in it in a constructive manner. Th

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Fix a flaw in our anti-invasion plan

Benjamin Caplan wrote: > Elliott Hird wrote: >> 2009/5/1 Alex Smith : >>> {{{ >>> Persons SHALL NOT join Agora for the primary purpose of invading or >>> waging war against it, rather than participating in it in a constructive >>> manner. This is the Class-12 Crime of Treason. >>> }}} >> AGAINST; w

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: May I please have another?

Taral wrote: > On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: >> Define plz? The last time I attempted to guess what you meant, we >> went from 1871/10 (Turns for All) to 1871/11 (The Standing Court >> aka Turns for All Volunteers), but you said that wasn't it. > > A standing court is a small

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Fix a flaw in our anti-invasion plan

Elliott Hird wrote: > 2009/5/1 Alex Smith : >> {{{ >> Persons SHALL NOT join Agora for the primary purpose of invading or >> waging war against it, rather than participating in it in a constructive >> manner. This is the Class-12 Crime of Treason. >> }}} > > AGAINST; waaay too abusable. A

DIS: Re: BUS: [Enigma] Now officially a Champion's Contest!

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Ian Kelly wrote: > Zing! Vext cwm fly jabs Kurd qoph Will we all get to learn what the Clues were?

DIS: Proto-Contract: Industrial Bank & Agora

The PBA, RBoA, and both Vote Markets are dead, which has made the economy a lot less interesting. This is a draft for a replacement, which allows regular banking, trade offers, and vote selling. Rates are manually set by the President (me) without two objections, and would be updated on a regular

DIS: Re: BUS: Fix a flaw in our anti-invasion plan

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > Per discussion on ##nomic: > > I submit the following proposal (AI 1, II 1, Title="Counter-Invasion"): > > Create a new power-1 rule with the following text: > {{{ > Persons SHALL NOT join Agora for the primary purpose of invading or > wagin

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [IADoP] Periodic Election (Anarchist)

2009/5/2 Aaron Goldfein : > On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn > wrote: >> 2009/5/2 Quazie : >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On May 1, 2009, at 6:32 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: >>> I nominate Tiger as Anarchist. >>> >>> I nominate myself. >>> >> NttPF >> >> >> -- >> -Tiger

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [IADoP] Periodic Election (Anarchist)

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > 2009/5/2 Quazie : >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On May 1, 2009, at 6:32 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: >> >>> I nominate Tiger as Anarchist. >> >> I nominate myself. >> > NttPF > > > -- > -Tiger > E simultaneously sent notices to both the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [IADoP] Periodic Election (Anarchist)

2009/5/2 Quazie : > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On May 1, 2009, at 6:32 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > >> I nominate Tiger as Anarchist. > > I nominate myself. > NttPF -- -Tiger

DIS: Re: BUS: [IADoP] Periodic Election (Anarchist)

Sent from my iPhone On May 1, 2009, at 6:32 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: I nominate Tiger as Anarchist. I nominate myself.

Re: DIS: [Campaign Speech]

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > I don't see how those players not listed can be considered watchers. > They didn't even respond to an email I sent asking if they are > watching the game. Proposal 5211, to remove people not paying attention from the Watchers list, failed ho

DIS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Office Report

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > -- > SpeakerMurphy ???   1 since 6 April, I believe.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: No more cronjobs at midnight

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 16:21 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote: >>       An entity's share price index is a non-negative integer, >>       defaulting to 0.  If an entity's share price index would become >>       a negative value, it becomes 0. > Attaching a

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: No more cronjobs at midnight

On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 18:33 -0400, comex wrote: > On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 16:21 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote: > >> An entity's share price index is a non-negative integer, > >> defaulting to 0. If an entity's share price index would become

DIS: Re: BUS: [Enigma] Last week's results

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > I award 0 points to root (for Mastermind; colours in the wrong order). It looks like the reason I got this wrong was because I mistakenly reversed the black and white pegs -- I'm used to the black pegs meaning "right color in the right place", a

DIS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Office Report

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > Rulekeepor    comex      25 Apr 09    20 Apr 09  2 CoE: The II of the Rulekeepor office is 3.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: No more cronjobs at midnight

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 16:21 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote: >>       An entity's share price index is a non-negative integer, >>       defaulting to 0.  If an entity's share price index would become >>       a negative value, it becomes 0. > Attaching a

DIS: Re: BUS: Fix a flaw in our anti-invasion plan

2009/5/1 Alex Smith : > Per discussion on ##nomic: > > I submit the following proposal (AI 1, II 1, Title="Counter-Invasion"): > > Create a new power-1 rule with the following text: > {{{ > Persons SHALL NOT join Agora for the primary purpose of invading or > waging war against it, rather than

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: No more cronjobs at midnight

On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 16:21 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote: > An entity's share price index is a non-negative integer, > defaulting to 0. If an entity's share price index would become > a negative value, it becomes 0. Attaching a tracked value to everything in existence is another mistak

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: No more cronjobs at midnight

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Ian Kelly wrote: >      (8) A player CAN spend share value 25 to split eir shares; eir >          share price index is halved (rounded down), and for each >          share of eir issue, an additional share of eir issue is >          created in the owner's possession

Re: DIS: [Campaign Speech]

2009/5/1 Aaron Goldfein : > I don't see how those players not listed can be considered watchers. > They didn't even respond to an email I sent asking if they are > watching the game. And Wooble, if you do become registrar and do > decide to list those players who did not respond to the email, that

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: No more cronjobs at midnight

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Ian Kelly wrote: > I'll vote FOR a proposal like this if it would also repeal notes and > replace them with something new and interesting the day after. Rough proto for a new economy. Comments? Retitle Rule 2126 as "Shares" and amend it to read: An entity

Re: DIS: [Campaign Speech]

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Elliott Hird > wrote: >> Incomplete watchers list :( > > Well, it's based on the last Registrar's Report.  I'd be happy to > reconstruct the list from the old one. > I don't see how those players not listed

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [IADoP] Registrar Election

On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 16:59 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Aaron Goldfein > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Aaron Goldfein > > wrote: > >> > >> I initiate an Agoran decision to choose the holder of the Registrar > >> office. The eligible vote

DIS: Who has gained points?

I'm wondering about what constitutes gaining points for the purposes of gaining notes - when someone wins by high score all points are lowered, so that week almost noone has a net gain, but if it's instantaneous gains that are counted then two players who are not gaining points otherwise could give

Re: DIS: Who has gained points?

On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 23:19 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > I'm wondering about what constitutes gaining points for the purposes > of gaining notes - when someone wins by high score all points are > lowered, so that week almost noone has a net gain, but if it's > instantaneous gains that are counte

Re: DIS: Who has gained points?

Gaining assets is explicitly defined, transfers don't count. Sent from my iPhone On May 1, 2009, at 5:24 PM, Alex Smith wrote: On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 23:19 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: I'm wondering about what constitutes gaining points for the purposes of gaining notes - when someone wins b

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Who has gained points?

On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 17:44 -0400, comex wrote: > On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn > wrote: > > Okay. I terminate the pledge I just made about giving points for > > points (if I can). > > Points are also a fixed currency, so you can't transfer them. You can, but only in a limited

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registration

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > Welcome to Agora, Manu. Is there any nickname you would like to use? Clearly, he wants to be known as Melbourne.

DIS: Re: BUS: Registration

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Manuel Lanctot wrote: > I register. > > ~Manu > Welcome to Agora, Manu. Is there any nickname you would like to use?

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Who has gained points?

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > Okay. I terminate the pledge I just made about giving points for > points (if I can). Points are also a fixed currency, so you can't transfer them.

DIS: Re: BUS: Registration

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 14:46, Manuel Lanctot wrote: > I register. > > ~Manu > Welcome back! BobTHJ

DIS: Re: BUS: Registration

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Manuel Lanctot wrote: > I register. Welcome back! -root

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: May I please have another?

Taral wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 6:36 PM, comex wrote: >> Self-recusals are already annoying and a waste of the judicial >> system's time; I'd prefer if the reasons people recuse themselves >> could be eliminated. Proto: add new postures for players who want >> some cases but not many. Pe

DIS: Re: BUS: No more cronjobs at midnight

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > I submit the following proposal (titled "Ease the rush", AI 2, II 1): > > Remove the text > {{{ >          unless another player has already done so >          during that Birthday. > }}} > from rule 2126. > > > Arguments: Loads of peop

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: May I please have another?

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 12:15, comex wrote: > On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Ian Kelly wrote: >> Judges used to be able to make themselves ineligible to judge specific >> cases or classes of cases by announcement (including the class of all >> cases; this was the original supine).  I think it was

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: May I please have another?

On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 6:36 PM, comex wrote: > Self-recusals are already annoying and a waste of the judicial > system's time; I'd prefer if the reasons people recuse themselves > could be eliminated.  Proto: add new postures for players who want > some cases but not many.  Perhaps you can flip y

DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2436 remanded to Taral by Murphy, coppro

I apologize for being late on this -- it's a very complex issue and I'm very busy IRL at the same time... -- Taral "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you." -- Unknown

DIS: Re: BUS: Interesting Recusals - one way or another.

Quazie wrote: > I submit a proposal, entitled "Interesting Recusals - CotC" AI = 1.5 > with the following body. > > Replace the following paragraph from R 2225 > > When a player recuses emself from a judicial case whose interest > index equals eir rank, e CAN increase its interest in

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: May I please have another?

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Quazie wrote: >> Or maybe, have a system under which people could "pre-recuse" themselves >> from specific cases, so they couldn't be assigned them. (Different >> people have different opinions on which cases are difficult; personally, >> I don't think 2477 is at a

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: May I please have another?

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 21:36 -0400, comex wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: >> > Proposal:  May I please have another? >> > (AI = 1.5, please) >> > >> > Amend Rule 1871 (The Standing Court) by appending this text: >> >

Re: DIS: [Campaign Speech]

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Elliott Hird wrote: > Incomplete watchers list :( Well, it's based on the last Registrar's Report. I'd be happy to reconstruct the list from the old one.

Re: DIS: [Campaign Speech]

Incomplete watchers list :( 2009/5/1 Geoffrey Spear : > Were I the registrar, I would publish the following: > > Registrar's Census > > Date of last report: Wed 29 Apr 09 > Date of this report: Fru 1 May 09 > > Date of last ratification: Fri 4 Jul 08 > Date of report last ratified: Sun 29 Jun 08 >

DIS: [Campaign Speech]

Were I the registrar, I would publish the following: Registrar's Census Date of last report: Wed 29 Apr 09 Date of this report: Fru 1 May 09 Date of last ratification: Fri 4 Jul 08 Date of report last ratified: Sun 29 Jun 08 (All times are UTC) Recent events - Wed 22 Apr 10:34-

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: May I please have another?

On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 21:36 -0400, comex wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > > Proposal: May I please have another? > > (AI = 1.5, please) > > > > Amend Rule 1871 (The Standing Court) by appending this text: > > > > A player who recuses emself without cause CAN flip

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: PNP

On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 11:27 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:22, comex wrote: > > I hereby explicitly, willfully refuse to become party to the PerlNomic > > Partnership agreement until such time as I may activate myself in > > PerlNomic or perform another action clearly inten

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2458 remanded to Taral

Taral wrote: > The appeals court has remanded this case to me without significant > comment for, I assume, a clarification of my reasoning behind my > judgement. Upon further review, I think the appellants (me included) were confused, pointing out CFJ 2459 which hinged on a technicality that does

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: May I please have another?

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Roger Hicks wrote: > Or better yet, let potential judges select the cases they wish to > judge through some suitable system and eliminate most all recusals. I > proposed this at one point but it was shot down. It seems to me that the best judicial system is one wh

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: May I please have another?

On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 19:36, comex wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: >> Proposal:  May I please have another? >> (AI = 1.5, please) >> >> Amend Rule 1871 (The Standing Court) by appending this text: >> >>      A player who recuses emself without cause CAN flip eir postu