On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Benjamin Caplan <celestialcognit...@gmail.com> wrote: > comex wrote: >> Repeats: (a nonnegative integer, or infinity; default 1) > [...] >> An Offer with zero Repeats is automatically destroyed. > As was pointed out on IRC, this won't ever happen. Try "When an Offer > with one Repeat is filled, instead of its 'Repeats' field being > decreased, the Offer is destroyed."
I changed it from 'positive' to 'nonnegative' so this shouldn't be a problem. >> Note: Please do not cast a vote like ISELL(8 zm - AGAINST)*8, as this >> won't do what you think. > ISELL(1 zm - AGAINST)*8, however, may be desirable -- so much so, in > fact, that it might be worth working out a clearer syntax for it. > Perhaps 8*ISELL(1 zm each - AGAINST). True. I was thinking of that, but the current language forces ISELL to be up to the voting limit-- 8*ISELL would sell all your votes eight separate times, almost certainly resulting in a breach of contract. I guess I may as well reword it to allow separate vote selling, although it's unlikely to occur in practice.
