Charles Reiss wrote:
> Quoth the AAA:
> {{
> 12. Once per week, a Farmer CAN attempt to purchase a new Land by
> announcing the type of Land e wishes to purchase. As soon as possible
> after such an announcement, if it is permitted for em to do so, the
> SoA CAN and SHALL revoke 3 Points from that
On 3/22/09 7:45 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Charles Reiss wrote:
>
>> I purchase a Mill.
>>
>> - woggle
>>
> How?
>
> coppro
Quoth the AAA:
{{
12. Once per week, a Farmer CAN attempt to purchase a new Land by
announcing the type of Land e wishes to purchase. As soon as possible
after such an ann
Charles Reiss wrote:
> I purchase a Mill.
>
> - woggle
How?
coppro
Ed Murphy wrote:
> CFJ: Proposal 6122 has taken effect.
>
> Caller's arguments: Per Rule 2034(c) as amended by Proposal 6139, the
> resolution of Proposals 6121 through 6139 constituted a self-ratifying
> claim that Proposal 6122 has not been prevented from taking effect.
Gratuitous arguments:
ais523 wrote:
> H. CotC Murphy: you have less than a day left to assign these, and they
> aren't listed in your database anywhere. Especially as proposal 6159 is
> pending, this is pretty urgent; otherwise, I'll have to try to exploit
> the possible dictatorship before its existence is ruled on, w
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> I intend, without 3 objections, to flip the contestmaster of the AAA to
>> Wooble.
>
> Having received only 1 objection, from comex, I flip the contestmaster
> of the AAA to Wooble.
I became a party to the AAA on
2009/3/23 Aaron Goldfein :
> Doesn't that rule serve no purpose anyway?
How dare you!
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
> 2009/3/22 Alex Smith :
> > On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 23:06 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> >> The following proposal is made as a part of the Anarchist's weekly
> >> duties.
> >> Date of this message: Sun 22 Mar 09
> >> Date of last fulfilment
So, if I want to make a proposal about us joining IN2, how should I
word it? Is referring to another nomic in the rules a good idea, or
should they be kept general?
2009/3/22 Alex Smith :
> On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 23:06 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>> The following proposal is made as a part of the Anarchist's weekly
>> duties.
>> Date of this message: Sun 22 Mar 09
>> Date of last fulfilment of these duties: Sat 14 Mar 09
>>
>> Proposal: Speaker Anarchy
>> (AI
On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 23:06 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> The following proposal is made as a part of the Anarchist's weekly
> duties.
> Date of this message: Sun 22 Mar 09
> Date of last fulfilment of these duties: Sat 14 Mar 09
>
> Proposal: Speaker Anarchy
> (AI=3, Disinterested)
>
> Repeal
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 16:39 +, Alex Smith wrote:
> I call for judgement on the statement "Murphy's recent attempt to cause
> Rule 2223 to amend itself to read 'This rule intentionally left blank'
> was using the mechanism specified in rule 2223, rather than the
> mechanism specified in the rule
I CFJ the statements {Rule 105 can, in whole or in part, prevent an
instrument from taking effect} and {If a proposal is caused to take
effect without explicitly being allowed to cause rule changes, it can
cause rule changes}. After some discussion in ##nomic, it isn't really
clear whether 105 actu
On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 14:41 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Warrigal wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> >> You seriously don't want to see the sort of thing a decent player could
> >> do if they had a positive power. (It wouldn't even need to be as high as
> >> 1.)
> >
> >
Warrigal wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
>> You seriously don't want to see the sort of thing a decent player could
>> do if they had a positive power. (It wouldn't even need to be as high as
>> 1.)
>
> Okay, what could they do with a positive power?
>
> --Warrigal
Am
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> You seriously don't want to see the sort of thing a decent player could
> do if they had a positive power. (It wouldn't even need to be as high as
> 1.)
Okay, what could they do with a positive power?
--Warrigal
On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 15:39 -0400, Warrigal wrote:
> I submit the following proposal, titled "A Silly Bribe", with adoption
> index 1.1:
>
> {Set the power of every player with at least one valid FOR vote and no
> valid AGAINST votes on this proposal to 1.05.}
>
> Don't worry, having power doesn'
Oh, and there's also Faucet Nomic.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Charles Walker <
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Oh. I guess it still counts as a nomic.
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
>
>> I researched this Fresh Nomic a little bit and I've found tha
Oh. I guess it still counts as a nomic.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> I researched this Fresh Nomic a little bit and I've found that they have
> exactly one member who is literally playing nomic by himself.
>
I researched this Fresh Nomic a little bit and I've found that they have
exactly one member who is literally playing nomic by himself.
Fresh Nomic, the nomic on the xkcd forums, and Blognomic.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> c-walker wrote:
>
> > I'm just checking up on how things are progressing regarding joining
> > InterNomic over here. Elsewhere it looks like we have 4 nomics ready to
> > join (If you wa
C-walker wrote:
> I'm just checking up on how things are progressing regarding joining
> InterNomic over here. Elsewhere it looks like we have 4 nomics ready to join
> (If you wait for B Nomic to catch up in around 6 days).
There hasn't been much discussion on the subject, apart from a typically
s
coppro wrote:
> Looking at the archives, the only effect of this clause would be to
> cause Zefram to win, rather than awaiting his return and posting es own
> win announcement. (Is {es} the correct word there? Or would {is} or
"eir". Most Agoran-Spivak pronouns are based on conjugations of "they";
c-walker wrote:
> I'm just checking up on how things are progressing regarding joining
> InterNomic over here. Elsewhere it looks like we have 4 nomics ready to
> join (If you wait for B Nomic to catch up in around 6 days).
Who are the other three?
I'm just checking up on how things are progressing regarding joining
InterNomic over here. Elsewhere it looks like we have 4 nomics ready to join
(If you wait for B Nomic to catch up in around 6 days).
C-walker
25 matches
Mail list logo
