I CFJ the statements {Rule 105 can, in whole or in part, prevent an
instrument from taking effect} and {If a proposal is caused to take
effect without explicitly being allowed to cause rule changes, it can
cause rule changes}. After some discussion in ##nomic, it isn't really
clear whether 105 actually prevents something from taking effect, or
whether it simply prevents the action caused by it taking effect.
Noticeably, there is nothing in the rules actually letting proposals
make rules changes; merely to cause them to take effect. This leads to
some interesting conundrums.
