Ed Murphy wrote:
> CFJ:  Proposal 6122 has taken effect.
> 
> Caller's arguments:  Per Rule 2034(c) as amended by Proposal 6139, the
> resolution of Proposals 6121 through 6139 constituted a self-ratifying
> claim that Proposal 6122 has not been prevented from taking effect.

Gratuitous arguments:

The resolution of those proposals does constitute such a claim, however,
you cannot prevent something that would never have happened in the first
instance (Otherwise, I just prevented you from being attacked by a lion.
You're welcome). Since the only means by which a proposal can take
effect is by adoption, and it was not adopted, the proposal never would
have taken effect, and therefore cannot have been prevented.

Reply via email to