comex wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Dvorak Herring
> wrote:
>> Wouldn't the following fail:
>> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
>>> Without objection, I make Billy Pilgrim inactive.
>>> Without objection, I make j inactive.
>>> Without objection, I make cmealerjr i
ais523 wrote:
> I spend D F# A to increase Murphy's caste to Alpha.
OMG you suck.
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> Without objection, I clean rule 2177 by replacing all instances of the word
> 'senator' with the word 'Senator' and all instances of the word 'senators'
> with the word 'Senators'.
I know you intended to write "I intend to clean", but you d
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Dvorak Herring
wrote:
> Wouldn't the following fail:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
>>
>> Without objection, I make Billy Pilgrim inactive.
>> Without objection, I make j inactive.
>> Without objection, I make cmealerjr inactive.
>
> because
Wouldn't the following fail:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> Without objection, I make Billy Pilgrim inactive.
> Without objection, I make j inactive.
> Without objection, I make cmealerjr inactive.
because rule 1728 requires:{
A person (the initiator) announced intent to
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 2009-03-01, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
>>> How dare he win?
>>
>> Oh I'm not annoyed; 'twas a good win. I just temporarily forgot about
>> the reset and was worried about the voting balance. Sorry 'bout that,
>> aft
On 2009-03-01, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
>> How dare he win?
>
> Oh I'm not annoyed; 'twas a good win. I just temporarily forgot about
> the reset and was worried about the voting balance. Sorry 'bout that,
> after the monthly Poobah adjustments I'll give em
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
> How dare he win?
Oh I'm not annoyed; 'twas a good win. I just temporarily forgot about
the reset and was worried about the voting balance. Sorry 'bout that,
after the monthly Poobah adjustments I'll give em a bump back up. -G.
How dare he win?
On 2009-03-01, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I spend C D# G to reduce ais523's caste by 1.
> I spend C D# G to reduce ais523's caste by 1.
> I spend F# A C# to reduce ais523's caste by 1.
> I spend F# A C# to reduce ais523's caste by 1.
> I spend F# A C# to reduce ais523's caste by 1.
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I spend C D# G to reduce ais523's caste by 1.
Note that when e won by Clout, eir caste was flipped to its default
value. So this flips em to Savage...
> I spend C D# G to reduce ais523's caste by 1.
> I spend F# A C# to reduce ais523's caste
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> Proposal: Removing Unqualified Senators (AI = 2, II = 1) {
>
> Amend rule 2177 (The Senate) by adding the following text as a separate
> paragraph to the end of the rule:
>
> Any Senator can declare a Senator not a Senator without 2 Senator
great!
On 2009-03-01, Alex Smith wrote:
> Without objection, I make Billy Pilgrim inactive.
> Without objection, I make j inactive.
> Without objection, I make cmealerjr inactive.
> The AFO goes on hold.
> I spend C Eb G to reduce OscarMeyr's caste to Savage.
> I spend C Eb G to reduce Dvorak
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Sgeo wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
> > Proposal: Removing Unqualified Senators (AI = 2, II = 1) {
> >
> > Amend rule 2177 (The Senate) by adding the following text as a separate
> > paragraph to the end of the rule:
> >
> > Any
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> Proposal: Removing Unqualified Senators (AI = 2, II = 1) {
>
> Amend rule 2177 (The Senate) by adding the following text as a separate
> paragraph to the end of the rule:
>
> Any Senator can declare a Senator not a Senator without 2 Senator
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I'm not sure about the exact order of loss, but in any case, there
> should be only five MwPs. I have the most recent winners as follows:
>
> 02/27/09 comex
> 02/05/09 Murphy
> 02/03/09 ais523, AFO
> 12/03/08 Pavitra
> 10/31/08 ais523
> 10/27/08
2009/2/28 Sgeo :
> I nominate myself for Herald.
>
> If Agora truly feels that I would be the best Herald, vote for me.
> Otherwise, someone else should take it, as it's not as fun as I
> thought it would be.
>
One last time, everybody...
*ahem*
Is Sgeo still the herald?
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 14:21 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Sgeo wrote:
>
> > Why would BobTHJ lose eir MwPship? pikhq should have lost it after
> > ais523+AFO won. BobTHJ then loses MwPship when comex wins. ais523
> > gains Speakership.
>
> Actually, I think your awards were correct, while the revocat
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Sgeo wrote:
> Why would BobTHJ lose eir MwPship? pikhq should have lost it after
> ais523+AFO won. BobTHJ then loses MwPship when comex wins. ais523
> gains Speakership.
>
Nevermind, forgot about Murphy's win.
Sgeo wrote:
> Why would BobTHJ lose eir MwPship? pikhq should have lost it after
> ais523+AFO won. BobTHJ then loses MwPship when comex wins. ais523
> gains Speakership.
Actually, I think your awards were correct, while the revocations
platonically occurred due to Rule 1922 (causing Rule 649 to r
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Sgeo wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Sgeo wrote:
>>
>>> comex Wins by Junta. I award the Patent Title of Champion to comex. I
>>> award the Patent Title of Minister without Portfolio to comex. The
>>> Patent Title of Minister without
Sgeo wrote:
> Why would BobTHJ lose eir MwPship? pikhq should have lost it after
> ais523+AFO won. BobTHJ then loses MwPship when comex wins. ais523
> gains Speakership.
I'm not sure about the exact order of loss, but in any case, there
should be only five MwPs. I have the most recent winners as
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Sgeo wrote:
>
>> comex Wins by Junta. I award the Patent Title of Champion to comex. I
>> award the Patent Title of Minister without Portfolio to comex. The
>> Patent Title of Minister without Portfolio is revoked from ais523.
>> Pavitra is the n
Sgeo wrote:
> comex Wins by Junta. I award the Patent Title of Champion to comex. I
> award the Patent Title of Minister without Portfolio to comex. The
> Patent Title of Minister without Portfolio is revoked from ais523.
> Pavitra is the new speaker.
Why didn't Pavitra have the Speakership anywa
Why would BobTHJ lose eir MwPship? pikhq should have lost it after
ais523+AFO won. BobTHJ then loses MwPship when comex wins. ais523
gains Speakership.
Taral wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> comex recused: 27 Feb 2009 15:22:49 GMT
>> Assigned to ehird: 27 Feb 2009 15:22:49 GMT
>
> I'm not going to CoE this, but please, Murphy, make it show case
> transfers. Maybe a check
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Taral wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> "intent" was too overloaded, but "advanced" isn't in the ruleset (yet) :).
>
> ... it's "advance notice", isn't it?
For others, sure. But we're ahead of the curve.
26 matches
Mail list logo
