Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ: Wins By Paradox Are . . .

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Warrigal wrote: > I CFJ on the following statement, then: > > If a CFJ were called on X on December 20 this year, it would be legal > to judge FALSE on the CFJ, where X is defined as the following string, > followed by a quotation mark, followed by the same string,

Re: DIS: braincorefckwars

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, comex wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Benjamin Schultz wrote: >>> Does there exist a decent Perl to Brainfuck parser / compiler? (There >>> probably does, as nobody in their right mind writes their code direc

Re: DIS: braincorefckwars

On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, comex wrote: > On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Benjamin Schultz wrote: >> Does there exist a decent Perl to Brainfuck parser / compiler? (There >> probably does, as nobody in their right mind writes their code directly in >> Brainfuck.) > > Doesn't compiling into Brainfuck

Re: DIS: braincorefckwars

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Benjamin Schultz wrote: > Does there exist a decent Perl to Brainfuck parser / compiler? (There > probably does, as nobody in their right mind writes their code directly in > Brainfuck.) Doesn't compiling into Brainfuck sort of defeat the purpose?

Re: DIS: braincorefckwars

On 18 Dec 2008, at 23:37, Benjamin Schultz wrote: Does there exist a decent Perl to Brainfuck parser / compiler? LOL (There probably does, as nobody in their right mind writes their code directly in Brainfuck.) Nobody who writes bf is in their right mind.

Re: DIS: braincorefckwars

Does there exist a decent Perl to Brainfuck parser / compiler? (There probably does, as nobody in their right mind writes their code directly in Brainfuck.) - Benjamin Schultz KE3OM

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Lousy Lack of Free Time

Charles wrote: > I cast the deciding vote to lynch avpx. avpx is lynched. Alas, e was a villager. The night phase begins. Werewolves, pick a target. Seer, pick a target. Witch, I'll get to you after the werewolves pick.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Anarchist] Proposals

On Dec 18, 2008, at 9:50 AM, Elliott Hird wrote: On 18 Dec 2008, at 12:34, Bayes wrote: Bayes submits the following proposal, titled "Repeal 'Contracts'" (AI=2, II=0): { Repeal Rule 1742 (Contracts). } Yespls Mee tu! - Benjamin Schultz KE3OM OscarMeyr

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Resolving Grand Poobah election

Sgeo wrote: >> I also recommend the following for termination: >> needed_support-- >> copy of needed_support-- >> Looping >> but not Z House, which can still be used for appeals. >> > Why should those be terminated? Because initiating a criminal case no longer requires support.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Resolving Grand Poobah election

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > I wrote: > >> I intend, without objection, to terminate (2008-12-02 Warrigal #2), >> quoted below: >> >>> I publicly pledge that if I get elected, I'll sort this out so that >>> harblcat, Siege and Charles get an equal chance. >> >> I intend, wit

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] uncontested elections

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 15:38, Elliott Hird wrote: > > On 18 Dec 2008, at 22:30, Roger Hicks wrote: > >> 23 crops > > Hmmmaybe e's a crop duster? BobTHJ

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] uncontested elections

On 18 Dec 2008, at 22:30, Roger Hicks wrote: 23 crops

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Resolving Grand Poobah election

I wrote: > I intend, without objection, to terminate (2008-12-02 Warrigal #2), > quoted below: > >> I publicly pledge that if I get elected, I'll sort this out so that >> harblcat, Siege and Charles get an equal chance. > > I intend, without objection, to terminate The Zombie of The List, > quot

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] uncontested elections

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 15:18, Charles Schaefer wrote: > 2008/12/16, Ed Murphy : >> >> Charles wrote: >> >> > I transfer 1 prop to Murphy for his Heroic effort updating the office of >> > Notary. >> >> Unsuccessful, source not specified. > > > I transfer one prop FROM MYSELF to Murphy. Murphy now

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] uncontested elections

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Charles Schaefer wrote: >> Unsuccessful, source not specified. > I transfer one prop FROM MYSELF to Murphy. Fails, reason not specified. :D

Re: DIS: braincorefckwars

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 13:29, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> Actually, this is starting to remind me of the 2004 ICFP contest, >> , >> although that's a lot more heavy-weight than what we'd be seeking to do >> here. (It had teams of ants mo

Re: DIS: braincorefckwars

On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Alex Smith wrote: > Could be interesting... in that case, most likely a two-dimensional grid > would be better, and the programs should have methods to locate and > shove around their opponent's data pointers. Maybe some sort of radar to > detect flags and pointers, with point

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Lousy Lack of Free Time

Sgeo wrote: > I vote to lynch avpx. Billy Pilgrim, Elysion, comex, ais523, and Sgeo are voting to lynch avpx (5 out of the needed 7). No one else is voting to lynch anyone.

Re: DIS: braincorefckwars

On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 10:11 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Just goes to show great minds think alike while fools etc. Pondered an > arrangement just like this but worried about exactly that degeneracy (and > others). I thought I'd drop this fundamental corewars part: > "The data buffer for each of

Re: DIS: braincorefckwars

On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Alex Smith wrote: > On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 09:54 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> I've been toying with an idea for a combined brainfuck (er sorry BobTHJ)/ >> corewars match... by which I mean BF language and array but two programs >> fighting for the array space. I think if done

Re: DIS: braincorefckwars

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > I've been toying with an idea for a combined brainfuck (er sorry BobTHJ)/ > corewars match... by which I mean BF language and array but two programs > fighting for the array space. I think if done right it would be a bit > more like Robo Rall

Re: DIS: braincorefckwars

On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 09:54 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > I've been toying with an idea for a combined brainfuck (er sorry BobTHJ)/ > corewars match... by which I mean BF language and array but two programs > fighting for the array space. I think if done right it would be a bit > more like Robo Rall

DIS: braincorefckwars

I've been toying with an idea for a combined brainfuck (er sorry BobTHJ)/ corewars match... by which I mean BF language and array but two programs fighting for the array space. I think if done right it would be a bit more like Robo Rally (if you've played that, wonderful board game) than core wa

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ: Wins By Paradox Are . . .

On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Alex Smith wrote: > On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 22:32 -0500, Warrigal wrote: >> Since apparently neither FALSE nor TRUE is appropriate, UNDECIDABLE is >> appropriate. >> >> The only reasonable way I can see to resolve this paradox is by >> repealing Rule 2110. > I believe it's a nic

DIS: Re: BUS: [Anarchist] Proposals

On 18 Dec 2008, at 12:34, Bayes wrote: Bayes submits the following proposal, titled "Repeal 'Contracts'" (AI=2, II=0): { Repeal Rule 1742 (Contracts). } Yespls

DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ: Wins By Paradox Are . . .

On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 22:32 -0500, Warrigal wrote: > I CFJ on the following statement: > > If a CFJ were called on X, it would be legal to judge FALSE on the > CFJ, where X is defined as the following string, followed by a > quotation mark, followed by the same string, followed by a quotation > ma

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2274 assigned to Elysion

On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Joshua Boehme wrote: > are of similar plausability to make the "I make Proposal X democratic" > ambiguous? (Note that I completely disagree with that, but I am trying to > make sense of where you're coming from.) "I use a mechanism that no longer exists (http://

DIS: Re: BUS: [Anarchist] Proposals

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 7:34 AM, Bayes wrote: > Bayes submits the following proposal, titled "Repeal 'Foreign communications'" > (AI=1, II=0): { > Repeal Rule 2184 (Foreign communications). > } I'll vote for this one. After all, what if a foreign nomic says that an appropriate forum for commun

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 6018-6026

On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 17:09 -0500, comex wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Elliott Hird > wrote: > > On 15 Dec 2008, at 18:00, Alex Smith wrote: > > > >> (Assuming you can't somehow leverage your dictatorship to stop it > >> passing in the first place...) > > > > of course we can. > > How

DIS: Re: BUS: nominations

On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 11:15 -0500, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > I nominate myself for Conductor. > > I nominate ais523, BobTHJ, and ehird for Accountor. > I do not yet accept, but I'll think about it. -- ais523