On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote:
> I wrote:
>
>> I intend, without objection, to terminate (2008-12-02 Warrigal #2),
>> quoted below:
>>
>>> I publicly pledge that if I get elected, I'll sort this out so that
>>> harblcat, Siege and Charles get an equal chance.
>>
>> I intend, without objection, to terminate The Zombie of The List,
>> quoted below:
>>
>>> 1. This is a public contract. This is a pledge. Goethe CAN terminate
>>> this contract by announcement.
>>> 2. If a pledge by Warrigal exists that contains The List, and The
>>> List is an ordered list of players which Warrigal is pledged to
>>> prioritize for Caste changes if/while e is Grand Poobah, then:
>>> (a) Any player below Goethe on The List CAN, by announcement,
>>> cast votes on behalf of Goethe on any Agoran Decision,
>>> provided that Goethe may legally vote on it.
>>> (b) If a player X has voted on behalf of Goethe under (a) above,
>>> then any player Y who is below player X on The List CAN by
>>> announcement retract those votes on Goethe's behalf, if
>>> Goethe may legally do so.
>>> (c) The bottom three players on The List CAN, by announcement,
>>> act on behalf of Goethe to support or object to any Dependant
>>> Action that Goethe may legally support or object to.
>>> (d) The single player immediately below Goethe on The List CAN,
>>> by announcement, act on behalf of Goethe to change players'
>>> positions on The List in any manner that Warrigal's pledge
>>> permits Goethe to so change.
>
> ehird, want to withdraw your objection to these, so that H. Notary
> Charles might complete the procedures?
>
> I also recommend the following for termination:
> needed_support--
> copy of needed_support--
> Looping
> but not Z House, which can still be used for appeals.
>
Why should those be terminated?
